Godius wrote:Damn, I just watched the qualifying and I'm amazed how many drivers their flying laps were destroyed because of Hamilton's mistakes in each session.
Ham set his fastest time in Q2 on that tyres with "an unsafe car". Driving "unsafe car" at racing speed in qualifying is OK, but driving it in race is a safety issue!? Ham has flat spotted tyre which was good enough to get him through to Q3, Raikkonen had his front wing stuck underneath a car while the track was still wet, it`s not the same thing.Wynters wrote:For those complaining about the tyre switch.
Pitting at the end of the first lap still has an unsafe car on the track for nearly an entire lap, with that car mid pack and the pack bunched. On a very fast circuit, surrounded by walls. People complained that Kimi didn't pull over in Monaco because he was unsafe and he only went a couple of hundred metres, slowly. This is a very long lap and speeds are much higher.
He could just go the usual way and start from the pits if it is that unsafe.Wynters wrote:For those complaining about the tyre switch.
Pitting at the end of the first lap still has an unsafe car on the track for nearly an entire lap,...
If this was any other driver then it wouldn't even be discussed.basti313 wrote:He could just go the usual way and start from the pits if it is that unsafe.Wynters wrote:For those complaining about the tyre switch.
Pitting at the end of the first lap still has an unsafe car on the track for nearly an entire lap,...
He was able to do two further laps and a great time in Q2 on this "unsafe" set of tires, so I see absolutely no reason for the change. Mercedes should have stopped him in Q2 if the tires were too unsafe to drive.
No matter what you discuss, it is a big gift from FIA. And in the past (RedBull in Spa for example) changes like this were never allowed, unless the tire suffered a puncture on the inlap due to debris on the track.