Oh, i thought that was still called the bonnet, but i guess you would still call it a boot? nevermind me...Just_a_fan wrote:
There is a boot. It's in the nose and is bigger than you normally get in these sorts of cars.
Well, i only said it would sway me towards the 458, but if someday i do have the money, i'd make sure to give both a bit of a go before making up my mind. Who knows, i may find the mp4-12c 'has a heart' or any of the other Clarkson clichesJust_a_fan wrote:
That's your choice - if you someday have the money, enjoy your 458
Very strange for a car who was fully acclaimed in March... Do McLaren totally change its setup or is it something else?More troubling for Mclaren are reports magazine testers found the handling "unrewarding", the brakes laking feel and the ride "citroen like" (yikes) at regular road speeds. at fast road speeds the MP4 "...suddenly feels all at sea, with only moderate loadings to deal with, the strange Citroen like ride reactions are back and the chassis feels out of tune with road''
Where is that quote from?Lurk wrote:They also said that.Very strange for a car who was fully acclaimed in March... Do McLaren totally change its setup or is it something else?More troubling for Mclaren are reports magazine testers found the handling "unrewarding", the brakes laking feel and the ride "citroen like" (yikes) at regular road speeds. at fast road speeds the MP4 "...suddenly feels all at sea, with only moderate loadings to deal with, the strange Citroen like ride reactions are back and the chassis feels out of tune with road''
I was thingking about this too. It's funny how all of the journos (and many others in here and elsewhere) have been moaning about not being able to turn off the ESP system in the McLaren but are happy that it and it's rivals all have non-manual gearboxes.HampusA wrote:It´s the active brakes i presume.
Humans doesn´t like computers taking care of what they are fully capable of what they can do themselves.
Just a guess though but my guess is that, like some Porsches, it´s too sterile and trying to help the driver to much.
Just_a_fan wrote:Plato makes an interesting point about the McLaren; that you need to drive it as McLaren designed it but that's not how he drives. Other reviews have mentioned that getting the best from the car means driving it in a certain way. Looks like that might be where McLaren have gone wrong (if you want to think that way) - they've built a car for them or rather the engineers have built a car for them. A "closed" car if you will. Ferrari have just designed a more "open" car which appeals to more people. That seems much more sensible and will help sales figures although I have no doubt McLaren will sell the -12C well enough. I wouldn't be surprised to see changes made in response to the issues raised by the various road tests (and customer feedback). And McLaren will provide these to existing car owners for free without doubt.
I wouldn't be surprised to hear the hypercar team were doing some careful re-evaluations of their design too.
Ron will read every review and will ensure the same doesn't happen again, of that we can be sure. The guy is much too focussed to allow the teams to mess up a second time.
Interesting watching the 458 in-car. Not sure I'd be laughing at opposite locking my way around a 140mph corner! "New trousers please Nurse!"