Everyone was on the same boat more or less. These soft are done after one lap or worse within a lap. Maybe Merc under Hamilton can get good race runs but everyone else is on the same boat. Max himself said this GP was 95% quali and then a procession of a race after few laps.IvailoStefanovBG wrote: ↑21 Sep 2019, 21:54Watching Vettlel`s onboard due to nighttime of qualifying dashbord can be clearly seen. All four tires are overheating trough the entire lap. They sacrifice tire life for better Q performance and hoping that can`t be overtaken on this city track. For me this is not sustainable car development - this is just bad performance management. This can work on track like Monza and Singapore but there are still 17 - 18 races. Redbull is facing two unsuitable tracks in a row like Spa and Monza and now Ferrari`s are doing some tricks in Singapore... Let`s not loose hope and wait till tomorrow .... Bottas is 1 sec behind pole also...
I prefer the team effort philosophy. You win together you lose together.JordanMugen wrote: ↑21 Sep 2019, 16:56Why be pessimistic?
Ferrari should be congratulated for doing the best job!
Clearly Red Bull - Honda is not good enough in qualifying at Singapore. Perhaps the blame is mainly on Honda side for lack of power...? Or chassis is losing time too? Who knows, anyhow nothing wrong with Ferrari winning by doing the best job.
Not sure where you saw that, drivability out of the corners was excellent today actually. The car simply lacks grip compared to last year and its down to the front wing changes.McMika98 wrote: ↑21 Sep 2019, 23:22The pain is hard to swallow being a Honda fan. All we want is for them to succeed. Last 4 years was says everything isnt enough. Its so frustating when hopes are built up and then have it backfire in the most unusual twist. The driveability out of traction corner is very bad and that is where the car is struggling.diffuser wrote: ↑21 Sep 2019, 23:16I prefer the team effort philosophy. You win together you lose together.JordanMugen wrote: ↑21 Sep 2019, 16:56
Why be pessimistic?
Ferrari should be congratulated for doing the best job!
Clearly Red Bull - Honda is not good enough in qualifying at Singapore. Perhaps the blame is mainly on Honda side for lack of power...? Or chassis is losing time too? Who knows, anyhow nothing wrong with Ferrari winning by doing the best job.
Honda are doing everything they can.
Toro Rosso has an outwash front wing, Red Bull does not. Red Bull's front wing is not even a halfway house, it is slightly cutaway at the outer top element and endplate from the Austria upgrade, but this is minimal compared to other cars.
I doudt that the drivability is the problem. There are probably a few little things that the Ferrari does better that add up to something. 1 of them is more power.Jaisonas wrote: ↑22 Sep 2019, 00:15Not sure where you saw that, drivability out of the corners was excellent today actually. The car simply lacks grip compared to last year and its down to the front wing changes.McMika98 wrote: ↑21 Sep 2019, 23:22The pain is hard to swallow being a Honda fan. All we want is for them to succeed. Last 4 years was says everything isnt enough. Its so frustating when hopes are built up and then have it backfire in the most unusual twist. The driveability out of traction corner is very bad and that is where the car is struggling.
Yes, but the microphones can not really catch it. The Honda sometimes has crazy misfires, one Torro Rosso had a misfire in FP3 after Raffles you could hear through half the city. Sounded like someone shot a rifle....can not be good for engine life.
Power! Really? This track there is barely any straights. Its got more corners than Monaco. Look at how quickly the competition drives off from low gear acute apex corners. Toro Rosso as a reference is further corroboration as they should have been Q3 contenders with the high downforce setup.
I also think in that way. Ferrari already know that they are 3d team here and they are 3d anyway. So why not a qualifying shot...IvailoStefanovBG wrote: ↑21 Sep 2019, 21:54Watching Vettlel`s onboard due to nighttime of qualifying dashbord can be clearly seen. All four tires are overheating trough the entire lap. They sacrifice tire life for better Q performance and hoping that can`t be overtaken on this city track. For me this is not sustainable car development - this is just bad performance management. This can work on track like Monza and Singapore but there are still 17 - 18 races. Redbull is facing two unsuitable tracks in a row like Spa and Monza and now Ferrari`s are doing some tricks in Singapore... Let`s not loose hope and wait till tomorrow .... Bottas is 1 sec behind pole also...
Isn’t this the same we saw in the 3 previous races? Mercedes with the better race setup, hunting the polesitter. Must be a good race to view than.IvailoStefanovBG wrote: ↑21 Sep 2019, 21:54Watching Vettlel`s onboard due to nighttime of qualifying dashbord can be clearly seen. All four tires are overheating trough the entire lap. They sacrifice tire life for better Q performance and hoping that can`t be overtaken on this city track. For me this is not sustainable car development - this is just bad performance management. This can work on track like Monza and Singapore but there are still 17 - 18 races. Redbull is facing two unsuitable tracks in a row like Spa and Monza and now Ferrari`s are doing some tricks in Singapore... Let`s not loose hope and wait till tomorrow .... Bottas is 1 sec behind pole also...
You mean the off throttle sound Honda and Renault engines do? This is not meant here, it is the crazy bangs sometimes especially on charging laps.