i think this is a little better look of this situation.
edit: Pedro Martínez de la Rosa
It's from the F150 ItaliaHail22 wrote:Edit: Nevermind looks to be the F 138 engine cover but the decals/logos are incomplete, for a moment I thought it was a development part.
wow, thanks for the vid (Hail22) and pictures (Stefan_),Hail22 wrote:The birth and photo montage of the F 138 with a small video near the end (Credit to Gianluca Scinetti):
Check out the crash structure and the "real" size of the side pods
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_muCq4XC35w[/youtube
Actaully here we could be seeing the notorius "multimotion duct" in the flesh. Especially IF (big if) the two vortices shed from the pillars kinks are to be ingested or not by the inlet depending on yaw.zoro_f1 wrote:i think this is a little better look of this situation.
It's too large to be for driver cooling , also it's no coincidence that behind this concept is Bigois and Sanchez.shelly wrote:Actaully here we could be seeing the notorius "multimotion duct" in the flesh. Especially IF (big if) the two vortices shed from the pillars kinks are to be ingested or not by the inlet depending on yaw.zoro_f1 wrote:i think this is a little better look of this situation.
More seriously, I think that this is too far fetched if we think the inlet could have directional capabilities, but it could be reasonable if we think of it as a switch going on/off depending on speed, as I wrote in my previous post.
F-duct in 2010 and double drs in 2012 has taught us that it is not impossible to have the switch signal located far from the zone where the effect of the switching is pursued (even if current drd are more "compact" in that regard).
Just wondering of course - anyway, after reading james allen article and not founding a fluidic switch in any of the usual places, I am a bit more convinced of what yesterday I labelled as imaginative - that the under chin inlet could be part of a fluidic switch system.
After all, Bigois was head of aero at merc who pionereed the ddrs, and david sanchez could well be the unnamed man that had the idea of the f-duct and developed it while working at mclaren
I think is an illusion unless they changed something there, this is a picture of day 1 testing at Jerez, clearly the shark mouth is not there.zoro_f1 wrote:i think this is a little better look of this situation.
The shading and definitive edges would clearly suggest an intake whether for cooling, DDRS etc who knows...a beautiful mystery it shall remain until at least Barcelona.
sirexilon wrote:
I think is an illusion unless they changed something there, this is a picture of day 1 testing at Jerez, clearly the shark mouth is not there.
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos- ... 5598_n.jpg
I was sure that is going to happen (either the video going private or deleted), that's why I took those shots out of the video. Good for us, we still have the photos of the chassis and they are spread over twitter too.Hail22 wrote:Haha anyone notice the video that I've posted has been made private all of a sudden? and the new revised video doesn't have the tub photos...go figure:
Either someone tipped off SFF1 or we have a team member from SFF1 monitoring these forums
Thank you Stefan for ripping the photos from the video as soon as you did...gives us enthusiasts a chance to be close to the car
Will be good to see what parts may turn up at Barcelona
Not so, my friend. The F2012 inlet is also on the F138.stefan_ wrote:[...]
To be on topic, I think that the inlet below the nose you are talking about, if it appeared after the first time Massa went out with the car, it's mainly for cooling (could have a secondary function but I doubt it) because, as someone pointed out earlier, Massa said that it was hotter (in the cockpit) than he expected, and with no other inlet present on the car (pedal area, tip of the nosecone) I think that is the cooling solution they have...
[...]