We don't know for sure that none of the other components weren't damaged when he had reliability issues, just that the team hasn't used new ones.Jolle wrote: Mercedes already said that their final update of the year will be in Spa, those things are planned months ahead. Plus he's "only" down on the turbo and MHGU-H, not the ICE or CE
Not very sure, but both Rosberg and Hamilton have 2 fresh engines for 9 races and his current one is at least good for about 4 or 5 Friday practices so that wouldn't be a problem.dans79 wrote:We don't know for sure that none of the other components weren't damaged when he had reliability issues, just that the team hasn't used new ones.Jolle wrote: Mercedes already said that their final update of the year will be in Spa, those things are planned months ahead. Plus he's "only" down on the turbo and MHGU-H, not the ICE or CE
He needs 2 of each for a total of 4 new components minimum. if memory serves, that means 20 place penalty, so not matter what he does, he is starting from the back. I think its a far wiser & safer strategy, to take two completely new engines. Take the safer start from the pit-lane, and get on with the rest of the season knowing baring a tragedy Lewis is good to go for the rest of the season.
Turning the power down, isn't just about reducing wear/load on the ICE. Turning the power down like Lewis did yesterday, makes all the components last longer.Jolle wrote: If he wants to take up more ICE's he wouldn't be saving his right now and they would made sure he would be fully loaded on all components now, which he isn't.
As Jolle said earlier, people at Merc have already said Spa or Monza is where they would introduce their final upgrade.TAG wrote:The only issue with taking the entire PU times two, he's get around the issue of not having the components available but he's miss out on any tokens Mercedes introduces for the remainder of the year, they'd only be going to Nico.
It was my understanding that ICE and Mgu k usage was inline with the plan. Also remember that the limit was upped to 5 because of the 21st race, I had read somewhere Merc had planned for 5 races per PU.simieski wrote:I believe hamiltons current component usage stands at:
Tc 5
ice 3
Es 4
Ce 4
Mgu h 5
Mgu k 3
I don't know if I am interpreting the rules wrong but I think merc have really missed out by not using more of the other components. A penalty is received once usage of any component exceeds 5. So if they go ahead with the double power unit change he will still only be at 5 ice and 5 mgu k. Surely it would have been better to have stuck in a new ice and mgu k sooner so when they do the double power unit swap and incur the penalty they would have increased the pool of all components to 7.
The first plan was prob to have a brand new PU for both drivers in Germany, but because of the (last) upgrade planned for Belgium, they gave the drivers just a new ES and CE, the rest follows in Belgium (ICE, TC and MGH-K/H).Tom145145 wrote:It was my understanding that ICE and Mgu k usage was inline with the plan. Also remember that the limit was upped to 5 because of the 21st race, I had read somewhere Merc had planned for 5 races per PU.simieski wrote:I believe hamiltons current component usage stands at:
Tc 5
ice 3
Es 4
Ce 4
Mgu h 5
Mgu k 3
I don't know if I am interpreting the rules wrong but I think merc have really missed out by not using more of the other components. A penalty is received once usage of any component exceeds 5. So if they go ahead with the double power unit change he will still only be at 5 ice and 5 mgu k. Surely it would have been better to have stuck in a new ice and mgu k sooner so when they do the double power unit swap and incur the penalty they would have increased the pool of all components to 7.
Slightly ahead of RBR, then a small gap to Ferrari, McLaren closing in and then a midfield where Renault is making the best progress.De Jokke wrote:Guys, jumping fast forward. What are you expecting of the 2017 season for Mercedes?
1)still the dominant car
2)still the best car but close with RBR and possibly Ferrari
3)top 3 car
4)non top 3 car
I think Merc managed to keep their staff intact for the new regulations so that's a good sign but can they eke out another advantage or will they lose everything due to the new regs??
I'm thinking it'll be option 2: still the best but by only a small margin.
Your thoughts?
The scale of the changes are significant.De Jokke wrote:Guys, jumping fast forward. What are you expecting of the 2017 season for Mercedes?
1)still the dominant car
2)still the best car but close with RBR and possibly Ferrari
3)top 3 car
4)non top 3 car
I think Merc managed to keep their staff intact for the new regulations so that's a good sign but can they eke out another advantage or will they lose everything due to the new regs??
I'm thinking it'll be option 2: still the best but by only a small margin.
Your thoughts?
It's quite obvious they've got tires worked out the best.FoxHound wrote: Their ability to use the tyres longer and harder than anyone else is the key to their dominance. The team have an understanding on tyres which used to be an Achilles heal previously. They can run longer, switch tyres on faster, and get more out of them when needed than the competition. It's an area they don't get much credit for, but one they really should.
Thanks to the private Pirelli test. Part of Brawns master plan.Juzh wrote:It's quite obvious they've got tires worked out the best.FoxHound wrote: Their ability to use the tyres longer and harder than anyone else is the key to their dominance. The team have an understanding on tyres which used to be an Achilles heal previously. They can run longer, switch tyres on faster, and get more out of them when needed than the competition. It's an area they don't get much credit for, but one they really should.