More than Max, yes. But the problem here is the team which must show equality and authority with both drivers.Starscreamer wrote:"I'm a team player "Andres125sx wrote:What are you trying to say posting that video?
More than Max, yes. But the problem here is the team which must show equality and authority with both drivers.Starscreamer wrote:"I'm a team player "Andres125sx wrote:What are you trying to say posting that video?
And Schumacher in Barcelona 2012 which runied his chance of starting the race in Monaco from the Pole.Starscreamer wrote:
First of all I'am happy everyone is alright [-o<
Will Alonso get also 2 penalty points for the crash?
Same mistake Verstappen made in Monaco :-" but I think FIA maintain double standards
The low nose probably helped and made sure the car didn't get launched into the air Webber-style.WaikeCU wrote:How you want to put it, Thank God Alonso didn't get launched when they collided. Last thing we want is seeing a Mclaren flying towards the catchfence like Villeneuve did back in 2001. The crash would have been less worse if the gravel trap was replaced by tarmac.
I´m not a fan of tarmac susbtituding gravel, but the problem here is when the car rolled due to digging into the gravel and took off, then the crash can be at any arbitrary car position, and that´s a lot more dangerous for the driver than slkidding over the tarmac and colliding with tec-pro barriers horizontally. Maybe not some decades back, but nowadays tecpro barriers have proved to be extremely effective (Verstappen st devote, Sainz shochi...) so I think today is safer a tarmac exit with tecpro barriers, than gravel traps wich can cause the car colliding at any dangerous position (driver head in for example, similar to Heidfeld in FE), crashing with a fence (wich does not absorb energy as well as tecpro barriers and causes very high decelerations) or even jumping over the fence and causing a catastropheME4ME wrote:The low nose probably helped and made sure the car didn't get launched into the air Webber-style.WaikeCU wrote:How you want to put it, Thank God Alonso didn't get launched when they collided. Last thing we want is seeing a Mclaren flying towards the catchfence like Villeneuve did back in 2001. The crash would have been less worse if the gravel trap was replaced by tarmac.
About the tarmac i'm not so sure. He would have skidded over the tarmac initially and than crashed into the wall at very high speed. Peak G-force would have been much higher. Although it looks dramatic, the gravel-trap and rolling of the car actually absore some of the energy. I guess you can compare it with jumping from some height and making a landing roll to ease the impact.
you should try harder, you haven't been objective with Sainz and Verstappen since last year 1st GP.Andres125sx wrote:Maybe you cannot be objective with drivers you like, but I always try to, and try it hard.Starscreamer wrote:No you come from Spain so that explains your commentAndres125sx wrote: Sorry but you´re mistaken, I´m not Max Verstappen![]()
We both have pink glasses for our driver
Esteban was on the inside defending his line, then moved back to the racing line for the corner....where's the problem with that? Should he stay on the inside because an ex-champ is trying to make an impossible move? Even if he doesn't have the F1 experience as Fred does, he didn't expect a move there because it is simply not possible to pass there.Andres125sx wrote:
Except Grosjean didn´t change direction twice as Esteban did![]()
BTW, before you start saying I´m spanish and I´m biased, that´s the conclusion they got in Sky, british TV. Gutierrez moved the wheel left when he shouldn´t. They draw a line on the onboard camera over the wheel to notice any movement, and it´s easy to see how he moved the wheel left just before the impact