The FIA MUST come out and declare that they will apply the rules as they should in the future. If Alonso had stalled his engine, it could've been Zanardi all over again - or worse.
Double waved yellows are no joke.
Should they enforce the 107% rule and get both Red Bulls, Force India's and Bottas to start at the back of the grid?Shrieker wrote:The FIA MUST come out and declare that they will apply the rules as they should in the future. If Alonso had stalled his engine, it could've been Zanardi all over again - or worse.
Double waved yellows are no joke.
I don't think it's fair to simply put this down to "Kimi doesn't care any more".sosic2121 wrote:experts and computer models agree that 2007 Ferrari was better car, and 2008 Mclaren was better. to say that massa and kimi then were mediocre drivers simply not fair. kimi was hugely fast while he cared, and massa was never the same after that spring...Moose wrote:Because, as I said above - the Ferrari was being driven by two somewhat middle of the line drivers, not anyone at the top end of the field. Both Massa and Kimi have proven subsequently to not be even close to the level of Alonso or Vettel. Hamilton has shown that he's up there with Alonso.FoxHound wrote:And yet, both cars had 8 poles. So how did you come to this conclusion?
hamilton is fast but he has issues.
This sounds reasonable. Unless you consider the fact that any reasonable fan understands that Alonso wouldnt be a 2X WDC unless merc's engine failed Kimi in both those seasons.Moose wrote:Once again - not saying that circumstances didn't conspire to make him champion, much like they did in '07 to make Kimi champion, but the McLaren was absolutely not the better car.FoxHound wrote:Sorry, you cannot say Car X is better than car Y because driver A is so much better than driver B. It's subjective, and Hamilton had an advantage of not having to fight his own team mate.Moose wrote: Because, as I said above - the Ferrari was being driven by two somewhat middle of the line drivers, not anyone at the top end of the field. Both Massa and Kimi have proven subsequently to not be even close to the level of Alonso or Vettel. Hamilton has shown that he's up there with Alonso.
I think it's entirely reasonable to observe driver comparisons in the same car, and draw the conclusion that Hamilton, Alonso and Vettel are on a similar level, but that Massa and Kimi are significantly below that level, and that as a result it's reasonable to infer that the Ferrari was a better car being driven by worse drivers in '08.
Hahaha what on earth? You should have posted this comment before 2014 happened LOLSR71 wrote:This sounds reasonable. Unless you consider the fact that any reasonable fan understands that Alonso wouldnt be a 2X WDC unless merc's engine failed Kimi in both those seasons.Moose wrote:Once again - not saying that circumstances didn't conspire to make him champion, much like they did in '07 to make Kimi champion, but the McLaren was absolutely not the better car.FoxHound wrote:
Sorry, you cannot say Car X is better than car Y because driver A is so much better than driver B. It's subjective, and Hamilton had an advantage of not having to fight his own team mate.
I think it's entirely reasonable to observe driver comparisons in the same car, and draw the conclusion that Hamilton, Alonso and Vettel are on a similar level, but that Massa and Kimi are significantly below that level, and that as a result it's reasonable to infer that the Ferrari was a better car being driven by worse drivers in '08.
However, Massa's engine could have failed him every race for 10 seasons in a row and he would have no impact on Alonso's WDC count. To repeat, Alonso's 2X WDC are only becaue Merc V8 failed.
Otherwise, the faster driver (Kimi) would have won and without the illegal mass damper.
As I understand it, the onboard gearbox ECU pre-selects the next gear based on the position of the car on the track. So if you're leaving the final corner in 4th gear, the ECU will preselect 5th gear so the upshift will be near-to instantaneous.Webber2011 wrote:Hey guys, I've been through the last 10 pages and couldn't see it mentioned, but forgive me if it's already been discussed.
Can someone explain to me the problem Max had in Quali when he said he had "lost the synch again" please ?
I assume this is a gearbox problem and did read that they have to 'synch" the gears at the start of the weekend.
Would be great if one of you could explain it further for me.
Thank you
No, we have to many people who don't want to hear, or can't handle the truth.RedNEO wrote:Ah please stop! Too many drama queens in here jeezShrieker wrote:The FIA MUST come out and declare that they will apply the rules as they should in the future. If Alonso had stalled his engine, it could've been Zanardi all over again - or worse.
Double waved yellows are no joke.
You could just watch the pole lap onboard, by the time Rosberg gets there, the thing isn't even green, it's just off like there's nothing to worry about.FoxHound wrote:
Can this be proven? If so, no case to answer for Ros.
Thanks mate.zac510 wrote:A driver's 'massive lift' is a bit like a real estate agent's 'moments from the station'. A completely indeterminable amount of time
As I understand it, the onboard gearbox ECU pre-selects the next gear based on the position of the car on the track. So if you're leaving the final corner in 4th gear, the ECU will preselect 5th gear so the upshift will be near-to instantaneous.Webber2011 wrote:Hey guys, I've been through the last 10 pages and couldn't see it mentioned, but forgive me if it's already been discussed.
Can someone explain to me the problem Max had in Quali when he said he had "lost the synch again" please ?
I assume this is a gearbox problem and did read that they have to 'synch" the gears at the start of the weekend.
Would be great if one of you could explain it further for me.
Thank you
If the car has lost sync then some kind of scenario such as, if the car thinks it's leaving the penultimate corner then the gearbox will prepare to downshift for the final corner, when the driver is actually wanting to upshift because he's leaving the final corner. Thus when the driver requests the upshift, it has to un-select 3rd before it can select 5th and some acceleration is lost.
(note I didn't actually check the gears used for the Hungaroring corners, these are just examples!)
Maybe just let the people who deal with that worry about that, that's there job afterall. It's easy to shout and scream behind a computer screen because nobody can put a name to a face. What rule did Rosberg break? He lifted, and nobody was hurt so what's the problem now?dans79 wrote:No, we have to many people who don't want to hear, or can't handle the truth.RedNEO wrote:Ah please stop! Too many drama queens in here jeezShrieker wrote:The FIA MUST come out and declare that they will apply the rules as they should in the future. If Alonso had stalled his engine, it could've been Zanardi all over again - or worse.
Double waved yellows are no joke.
It shouldn't matter if it was Lewis, Nico, Vettel, Alonso, Ric, Max or any other driver. If you break a safety rule, the FIA should penalize you heavily period.