2009 Testing - March (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

ISLAMATRON wrote:SECU does not allow the engine power to be cut by any other way but by the reduction of throttle input. No traction control... thankfully.
That is engine power. Imagine two possibilities.
1) Your "start" engine map is laid in such way that engine is always run a bit lower that tyres can handle. Additional power from KERS put them on sweet spot. Control KERS to control wheelspin.
2) Engage KERS (as generator) when you detect wheelspin. I.e. use excessive power to charge batteries.
Both ways allow to run engine with constant throttle but achieve effect of TC.

However, if KERS is run from SECU it must be easy to limit those possibilities.

Scotracer
Scotracer
3
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 17:09
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

The FIA have explicitly ruled against the use of KERS as a form of traction control.
Powertrain Cooling Engineer

User avatar
Shaddock
0
Joined: 07 Nov 2006, 14:39
Location: UK

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

You can charge the KERS device whilst the engine is idling (~6-7000rpm) on the grid pre start.

Conceptual
Conceptual
0
Joined: 15 Nov 2007, 03:33

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

ISLAMATRON wrote:
Conceptual wrote:
ISLAMATRON wrote:probly not, if you can spin the wheels with the engine than why waste the limited stored KERS energy per lap by helping spin the wheels more. As soon as you can go full throttle without spinning the wheels than bang the KERS button... same with coming off the the corner onto the longest straight. With these big power cars everything is gription limited.
I dunno...

I think engaging the 80HP KERS first may give you enough of a start that you may get to WOT w/traction quicker. ESPECIALLY if the KERS unit is fed in through a CVT...

Ciro, does your brain spit out any maths concerning this?

Thanks!
Max accell comes with just a little bit of wheel spin, 80 hp is not enuff to spin those big rear slicks.

Just think about how much throttle they give it to spin them up when they are warming up in formation lap.
Sure, but my wifes car weighs more than an F1 car, and only has 95hp with radials, and that thing takes off pretty quick in first gear.

I think Kilcoo may be onto something with the low rev thing. 80hp through a CVT should be enough to start the forward movement, and maybe "just enough" to launch the car the first meter, and then the 800HP can kick in.

I think however, this is only going to be revealed during the season to see what advantages the teams have put these units to...

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

What is the guy with the N Tank on his back doing with the car???

http://premium.f1-live.com/f1/photos-hi ... po_105.jpg

Is this something KERS Related???

Scotracer
Scotracer
3
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 17:09
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

The Pneumatics?
Powertrain Cooling Engineer

RJC_pt
RJC_pt
0
Joined: 18 May 2007, 21:59
Location: Braga, Portugal

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

Kers cooling?

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

Interesting

Its some sort of gas, but dunno how its called
I dunno where the N stands for in science
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

SoftBatch
SoftBatch
0
Joined: 29 Jun 2006, 21:53
Location: Madison, AL, USA

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

N is Nitrogen although since nitrogen naturally occurs in pairs N2 would have been a better description.

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

It could be used to refill the suspension systems.
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

scarbs
scarbs
393
Joined: 08 Oct 2003, 09:47
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

Most likely to fill the engines pneumatic system (for the valves). Although the bottle seems awfully large.

SoundMan
SoundMan
0
Joined: 08 Jan 2008, 19:41
Location: UK

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

ESPImperium wrote:What is the guy with the N Tank on his back doing with the car???

http://premium.f1-live.com/f1/photos-hi ... po_105.jpg

Is this something KERS Related???

i think this is liquid nitrogen to kool the KERS system, almost sure of it. makes a lot of sense, good idea from BMW there.

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

SoundMan wrote:i think this is liquid nitrogen to kool the KERS system, almost sure of it. makes a lot of sense, good idea from BMW there.
No it's not. Hint - you'd have ice on the "cable". Cryogenic devices looks different.

avatar
avatar
3
Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 22:01

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

It strikes me that being able to start a race with charged KERS
gives KERS runners a big advantage off the grid.

As others mentioned, it might not be useful until 2nd gear phase
when you're at full throttle (i.e. your not backing off the
throttle to control wheelspin)

After all, why waste the charge of your KERS for an extra 80bHP,
when you've still got spare horses available under your right foot?

The only reason I can think of where you'd want to consume KERS
power at less than full throttle is to save the engine.



Eau Rouge should be interesting with a boost button...
Last edited by avatar on 14 Mar 2009, 15:10, edited 1 time in total.

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: March Testing Thread 2009 (Jerez & Barcelona)

Post

avatar wrote:It strikes me that being able to start a race with charged KERS
gives KERS runners a big advantage of the grid.

As others mentioned, it might not be useful until 2nd gear phase
when you're at full throttle (i.e. your not backing off the
throttle to control wheelspin)

After all, why waste the charge of your KERS for an extra 80bHP,
when you've still got spare horses available under your right foot?

The only reason I can think of where you'd want to consume KERS
power at less than full throttle is to save the engine.



Eau Rouge should be interesting with a boost button...
I feel that the FIA will eventually make a ruling disabaling KERS for the first sector of a lap (or first 30 seconds of the race, whatever is shortest) to make shure that the grid is equalised off the grid if theres going to be a big enough advantage, making starts pretty much what they used to be, but making the fun start from lap 2 onwards.

But on the otherhand, there could be a advantage for the non KERS cars for example at Oz (into turn 2) or Bahrain (into turn 4) as the KERS systems will be spent and the non -KERS cars can slipstream down the inside whilst the KERS car infront cant engage the boost as its spent and is recharging.