Red Bull RB6

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

so the off line driving to pick up marbels and stuff is just to gain weight?

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

Hang on a second, why the conspiracy, isn't it common sense?

At the start the car is heavy, the body will be low, with a big gap from tyre to floor, and suspension arms at a high angle. At the end of the race, the car will be light, body will be high, the floor close to the tyre, the suspension arms at a low angle.

Anyway, rather than our conjecture, what we really need is a pic of the rear suspension when the car was fully fuelled on the grid.

gibells
gibells
3
Joined: 08 Apr 2009, 16:23
Location: Andalucia, Spain

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

Well, that and a picture of the car crossing the line, so we can assess any suspected ride height change.

twoshots
twoshots
2
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:37

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

As long as the car is going at the same speed in both pictures...you can't compare the ride height with and without aerodynamic downforce.

In park ferme the car is light on fuel and has no aero downforce. Not surprising that is looks much higher than during the race.

segedunum
segedunum
0
Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 13:49

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

Compare it to the other cars though............ It's entirely subjective right now.

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

marcush. wrote:so the off line driving to pick up marbels and stuff is just to gain weight?
Yes. You can often hear radio instructions from the pits to a driver not to forget to pick pieces of rubber. It's an ancient thing in F1.

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

manchild wrote:
marcush. wrote:so the off line driving to pick up marbels and stuff is just to gain weight?
Yes. You can often hear radio instructions from the pits to a driver not to forget to pick pieces of rubber. It's an ancient thing in F1.
hm .I ´d say you are unlikely to pick up more than a few hundred grammes of debris
but over half a kilogramme..? I´m not sure, that sounds a lot to me ...at 0,9 g/cm³
specific weight you would need the equivalent of 1 litre volume to gain a kilo on weight..ok seems possible...so a worthwhile exercise as a little extra insurance on the scales...

Pedro
Pedro
1
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 15:59

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

Adrian Newey peeping at F10: "Well, those rims are smart! Damned homologation." :D
Image
Source: F1news.cz
http://www.f1news.cz

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

Pedro wrote:Adrian Newey peeping at F10: "Well, those rims are smart! Damned homologation." :D
Image
to me that ferrari looks very low in park ferme..

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

They are all very low, apart from the red bull RB6.
Probably because the rest have to use very hard spring rates to compensate for the change in weight from fully fueled to nearly empty, if they do not have a demon ride height system.
Perhaps this is also why the McLaren was so stiff on its springs?
I think the Ferrari was softer and that is I think why Adrian was so interested in it. I would be.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

marcush. wrote:
Pedro wrote:Adrian Newey peeping at F10: "Well, those rims are smart! Damned homologation." :D
Image
to me that ferrari looks very low in park ferme..
Ferrari use a pit lane ride height adjustment system that is adjusted at the tyre change I think. So it will be lower than the race start fuel weight might suggest it should be.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

So in that case ride height becomes totaly dependent on when the tyre change is made. Not very good that is it?

User avatar
forty-two
0
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 21:07

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

autogyro wrote:So in that case ride height becomes totaly dependent on when the tyre change is made. Not very good that is it?
+1 If this IS true, the cars had only two different ride heights during the race (one at the start, one at the 1st pitstop), with PERHAPS an additional one made (?? by the driver) before getting out of the car in park ferme?

I therefore think that any team which could come up with a PASSIVE system which automatically cranked the car down as the race went on would have a slight but significant advantage over others.
The answer to the ultimate question, of life, the Universe and ... Everything?

thestig84
thestig84
10
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 13:09

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

Have any of you seen Autosport. Sorry if I have missed it and thats why your talking about it but I think it was Mark Hughes' column. He reckons (like quite a few of you) that they have a passive ride system.

Roughly described as a damper that adjusts to the extra load allowing them to qualify with a low ride height then when weight is added this allows for the extra weight through the race.

Sorry if its not a great description. Just read it quickly in Tescos! It doesnt explain why the car is high in parc ferme. He also spoke to a few other teams that thought its possible and not too hard to implement.

Edit: He started digging around after seeing the the car move over for another car on qualy and scraped along the floor then kerb.

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Red Bull RB6

Post

Pedro wrote:Adrian Newey peeping at F10: "Well, those rims are smart! Damned homologation." :D
Image
looks like he is assessing the similarities and differences in design with the f10 and rb6.
There must be something he likes about it.
For Sure!!