variante wrote:astracrazy wrote:when i say less cars i mean 1st come 1st serve when it was announced this championship was going to start
It would get a bit comical in my opinion: there wouldn't be any trace of meritocracy. ok, the champion might be automatically registered, but the other entrants would just be the first to notice the "start of the new season announcement" and have an internet connection available. And of course A LOT of people would be excluded to make that effective.
you've just quoted me in something and yet not taken any notice of what it said.
when i say less cars i mean 1st come 1st serve when it was announced this championship was going to start
. I'm taking back in October or whatever. I'm not sure at whats comical in saying we are going to have a championship of 15 teams entrants on a 1st come 1st serve basis. it happens with everything in life.
wigglez28 wrote:I think its a bad idea to limit the entrants to such a small number, if there were only 10 teams then there would have been no Variante, RicMe85 and many other teams. I don't see how this is very fair or very effective for the sponsors. I would be very suprised if KVRC had to limit teams as I suspect as many teams will leave as will join keeping the number at a perfectly reasonable level. I know the more races the better but I think its much fairer to have 40 teams, and 3 races than 10 teams and 9/10 races.
i was using 10 and 15 as an example of trade off between entrants and amount of races we could have
it depends what view the sponsors have i guess
If the championship is limited by cpu time then the championship should be set up accordingly to ensure there is a fine balance. In an ideal word there would be no limit and we could have 35-40 cars and 10 or so races.
----
anyway i'm not here to argue i'm just simply making examples of how we could of had more races.