To me the obvious strategy when Lewis caught up Kimi and couldn't get by was to pit him and undercut Kimi at that point, I don't see the difference in doing this compared to him attempting to do that if he'd of not pitted under the VSC. He was effectively going to be mirroring Kimi's strategy but he'd of had track position as Kimi was super slow at that point. I don't think Lewis had much worse Deg than Kimi it's just his first set of softs blistered due to pushing so hard. Even prior to the VSC Lewis was close to Kimi so they had more pace.Shrieker wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 22:41Congrats to Kimi, he didn't put a foot wrong. His start was perfect, and although it didn't look like much at the time, his defense on very worn ultras against Hamilton was key. He not only held his position, but prevented Hamilton from gaping him; moreover, he backed Hamilton into the pack, which was crucial since it ended up putting cars between him and Hamilton, especially Verstappen.
Merc strategy on the other hand wasn't bad, despite the fact that some fans are bashing them over it. Where they failed to get a hint strategy wise was when Hamilton on much better tires couldn't get past Kimi in the first stint. They should've opted for track position, which was possible by pitting the next lap after Kimi. Worst case they'd have retained 2nd and not fallen behind Max, which would've given Hamilton 34 laps to chase and pressure Kimi into an error - not that it looked like he'd have made one today. Their second mistake was extending their 2nd stint too much and falling behind Max (rookie pitwall mistake), when they had a window of 10+ laps to pit and still come out ahead of him.
You know as much about overtaking as Vettel!Juzh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 23:49
They didn't have any real race, hamilton was never going to put himself anywhere near verstappen without 100% guaranteeing easy overtake. When it got close hamilton backed out of it and even drove completely off the track lol, how is that not a bad racecraft in this particular case? He wasn't even trying.
Which makes it a bit of a throw, doesn't it ? IF I were them, I sure would've taken the VSC stop as well. It was too good to pass up at that point. I do believe they made the mistake(s) later ( not under/overcutting Kimi's stop, or staying out too long on blistered softs).tranquility2k4 wrote: ↑22 Oct 2018, 00:01To me the obvious strategy when Lewis caught up Kimi and couldn't get by was to pit him and undercut Kimi at that point, I don't see the difference in doing this compared to him attempting to do that if he'd of not pitted under the VSC. He was effectively going to be mirroring Kimi's strategy but he'd of had track position as Kimi was super slow at that point. I don't think Lewis had much worse Deg than Kimi it's just his first set of softs blistered due to pushing so hard. Even prior to the VSC Lewis was close to Kimi so they had more pace.
Hamilton was a bit tentative around Max, wasn't he ? Max's 'bad boy' image seems to have worked (too bad), since if was that someone else, Hamilton would've risked going a bit tighter to avoid dirt on the outside. But with Max it's just not worth it since that kid can make you fly at 250+ kph and not feel an ounce of responsibility for doing it.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑22 Oct 2018, 00:04Hamilton gave Max room on the inside, so that they wouldn't touch (looking at you Seb!) but ended up on the marbles off line so understeered outwards. Max was clever and made Hamilton give him a bit more room than he needed. Hamilton was agressive in trying to overtake but careful. Result: no spin, no impact, no damage. Everyone enjoyed the moment, no one did alike they did on lap one...
![]()
He was definitely playing it safe, but that is partly why he is where he is. He's one of the best / the best in wheel to wheel racing. Knowing when to give room is just as important as knowing when to brake later than the other guy. "Know your enemy" as the saying goes.
Exactly. There was a race last year (Which one however escapes me) in which Verstappen was on fresh tyres and Hamilton knew he was coming and pretty much waved him through. Like I say it’s the case of seeing the bigger picture and knowing when and where to push your luck.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑22 Oct 2018, 00:13He was definitely playing it safe, but that is partly why he is where he is. He's one of the best / the best in wheel to wheel racing. Knowing when to give room is just as important as knowing when to brake later than the other guy. "Know your enemy" as the saying goes.
However when it’s became clear that Hamilton had lost grip his reaction was correct. That being let the place go and take the gradual line and live to fight another day. No snatching of a brake of an overcorrection just play it smooth.GrandAxe wrote: ↑22 Oct 2018, 00:22If Lewis move on Max had happened early in the race, before the formation of so many marbles, it would have been "job done, bye, everyone go home" and we would have been talking about another brilliant overtake instead.
The real point to take home though, is that Max can be overtaken in a keen battle without as much as the slightest scratch. Vettel and Bottas just don't know how.
Oh hell yes.Bomber_Pilot wrote: ↑22 Oct 2018, 00:28This race made my dayMerry International Everybody Happy for Kimi Day (credit to turbof1)
![]()
Even then I am surprised how much risk Hamilton is still willing to take.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑22 Oct 2018, 00:13He was definitely playing it safe, but that is partly why he is where he is. He's one of the best / the best in wheel to wheel racing. Knowing when to give room is just as important as knowing when to brake later than the other guy. "Know your enemy" as the saying goes.