ChrisF1 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 11:26I assume you're a Hamilton/Mercedes fan?f1jcw wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 11:13Artur Craft wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 02:27
The only people who dislikes the current regulation are the same group of people that loved the horrible 2014 one(ie Hamilton fans). We have closer racing now, pretty and fast cars, and the field is more bunched up.
Closer racing? We had one team run away with most of the wins. We have people not like the regulation changes due to this who are not Mercedes fans. We have restricted development, how is it any different from 2014.
Yes, one team won most of the races, but it was in no way anywhere near what Merc were doing in 2014-2016.
Others only won because of Merc failures. Ferrari and Mercedes won races on pure pace in 2022.
If Charles hadn't been throwing it off the road, and Ferrari been putting their car on the wrong strategy, we would have actually seen a good battle. If Merc hadn't taken 12 races to get on top of their car, we would have seen a good battle.
2023 will be closer than 2014-2016 ever was. 2023 was about people getting cars wrong with a new concept. 2014 was about people getting cars right, and still being a second off because they didn't have a Merc engine.
Edit: Also, 2014 became an engine formula as you ignored me saying before.
Merc had their engine on the Dyno since 2008, and were pushing the rules towards an engine formula they favoured. They totally mugged off the rest of F1 with an engine that had 15% more power than the rest of the grid.
It made Williams second best for god's sake - how can you possibly compare 2022 to the engine formula failure that gifted a very good driver 80 wins, and wrongly propelled him into "great" territory?
This is just completely ridiculous. 15% more power! Man come on!Merc had their engine on the Dyno since 2008, and were pushing the rules towards an engine formula they favoured. They totally mugged off the rest of F1 with an engine that had 15% more power than the rest of the grid.
You know McLaren and Force India had a Mercedes engines as well? Yet they finished 5th a 6th respectively. And also Williams wasn't 2nd best, they finished 3rd.It made Williams second best for god's sake...
There was a big difference in relative performance in 2014 compared to 2022 - that 1 team wins consistently does not mean it was never tense, or that the team always wins by an enormous margin. And things would likely have been better were it not for midseason rulechanges.
IIRC FIA hadn't mandated all PUs from a supplier had to have exact same engine software for both factory and customer teams, until 2017 or 18? They had mandated hardware parity but not software. Mercedes could have controlled the customer team's PU utilisation. Besides, customer teams cannot dictate the engine fitment according to their aero needs, which factory team can, which is a big boost in how you design a car. We can go on listing the advantages. McLaren had gone bad in 2013 and they haven't recovered yet.F1Krof wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 14:12ChrisF1 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 11:26I assume you're a Hamilton/Mercedes fan?
Yes, one team won most of the races, but it was in no way anywhere near what Merc were doing in 2014-2016.
Others only won because of Merc failures. Ferrari and Mercedes won races on pure pace in 2022.
If Charles hadn't been throwing it off the road, and Ferrari been putting their car on the wrong strategy, we would have actually seen a good battle. If Merc hadn't taken 12 races to get on top of their car, we would have seen a good battle.
2023 will be closer than 2014-2016 ever was. 2023 was about people getting cars wrong with a new concept. 2014 was about people getting cars right, and still being a second off because they didn't have a Merc engine.
Edit: Also, 2014 became an engine formula as you ignored me saying before.
Merc had their engine on the Dyno since 2008, and were pushing the rules towards an engine formula they favoured. They totally mugged off the rest of F1 with an engine that had 15% more power than the rest of the grid.
It made Williams second best for god's sake - how can you possibly compare 2022 to the engine formula failure that gifted a very good driver 80 wins, and wrongly propelled him into "great" territory?This is just completely ridiculous. 15% more power! Man come on!Merc had their engine on the Dyno since 2008, and were pushing the rules towards an engine formula they favoured. They totally mugged off the rest of F1 with an engine that had 15% more power than the rest of the grid.
You know McLaren and Force India had a Mercedes engines as well? Yet they finished 5th a 6th respectively. And also Williams wasn't 2nd best, they finished 3rd.It made Williams second best for god's sake...
I realize you can be one of those fans who despise Mercedes, but common, let's just be more objective please. Let's just not pull out completely dumbfounded numbers.
So what races did CL compete in which Redbull had no problems / failed to finsh in? CL only won 1 race in which Max finished in, and max settled for 2nd, As he said in his interview after, and every body was hailing the " New mature world champion Max ". Max never broke sweat in 2022.Sieper wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 14:02This is so poor. The fact that only the two Mercedes drivers could compete was NOT a sign of dominance you say, while Max fighting with Charles (not Checo) at least until the halfway mark IS a sign of dominance is twisting reality. Plus, it is super off topic.Mosin123 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 13:54I dont remember Williams finishing the season 2nd in 2014 - till now. 2014 - 2016 seen more action between 1st n 2nd than we did last year. even if it was just between the Mercs, least it was a compitition. LH had a far harder time beating Rosberg than Max had beating any one last year. Max didnt even break sweat. compare how Max gets out the car in 2021 to last year, most of the races last year he looked as if he hadnt even started racing yet. Redbull dominatedChrisF1 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 11:26
I assume you're a Hamilton/Mercedes fan?
Yes, one team won most of the races, but it was in no way anywhere near what Merc were doing in 2014-2016.
Others only won because of Merc failures. Ferrari and Mercedes won races on pure pace in 2022.
If Charles hadn't been throwing it off the road, and Ferrari been putting their car on the wrong strategy, we would have actually seen a good battle. If Merc hadn't taken 12 races to get on top of their car, we would have seen a good battle.
2023 will be closer than 2014-2016 ever was. 2023 was about people getting cars wrong with a new concept. 2014 was about people getting cars right, and still being a second off because they didn't have a Merc engine.
Edit: Also, 2014 became an engine formula as you ignored me saying before.
Merc had their engine on the Dyno since 2008, and were pushing the rules towards an engine formula they favoured. They totally mugged off the rest of F1 with an engine that had 15% more power than the rest of the grid.
It made Williams second best for god's sake - how can you possibly compare 2022 to the engine formula failure that gifted a very good driver 80 wins, and wrongly propelled him into "great" territory?
Don't forget, Ferrari dropped development of 2022 car after summer break when TD039 impacted them and their PU reliability issues forced them to turn the engine down. Same with Red Bull as they didn't need to bring upgrades. Mercedes kept developing the car until last race and the high altitude circuits like Mexico and Brazil favoured their draggy car to make them look better than they were. First half was indeed quite a fight, whether someone likes it or not. If it wasn't for TD039 and the engine reliability issues, the fight would have gone on until the end and I guess then Mercedes wouldn't have looked as good as they did. If Ferrari had sorted their issues, then there would be another fight this year.Mosin123 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 15:38Lets not forget, Ferrari finished closer to 3rd than 1st, and as every body keeps saying, Mercs car was rubbish last year yet they nearlly stole 2nd from ferrari, Unless your saying last year was a 3 way fight for the constructors, whilst saying 3rd was crap and 2nd although nearlly beaten by " crap " was on par is an odd way at looking at the championships.
IIRC it was 2014 Austria where Williams looked to beat Merc but where then not allowed to use certain power settings from Mercedes...Things like that was one of the big reasons why Dennis went shopping for another engine.mendis wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 15:36IIRC FIA hadn't mandated all PUs from a supplier had to have exact same engine software for both factory and customer teams, until 2017 or 18? They had mandated hardware parity but not software. Mercedes could have controlled the customer team's PU utilisation. Besides, customer teams cannot dictate the engine fitment according to their aero needs, which factory team can, which is a big boost in how you design a car. We can go on listing the advantages. McLaren had gone bad in 2013 and they haven't recovered yet.F1Krof wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 14:12ChrisF1 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 11:26
I assume you're a Hamilton/Mercedes fan?
Yes, one team won most of the races, but it was in no way anywhere near what Merc were doing in 2014-2016.
Others only won because of Merc failures. Ferrari and Mercedes won races on pure pace in 2022.
If Charles hadn't been throwing it off the road, and Ferrari been putting their car on the wrong strategy, we would have actually seen a good battle. If Merc hadn't taken 12 races to get on top of their car, we would have seen a good battle.
2023 will be closer than 2014-2016 ever was. 2023 was about people getting cars wrong with a new concept. 2014 was about people getting cars right, and still being a second off because they didn't have a Merc engine.
Edit: Also, 2014 became an engine formula as you ignored me saying before.
Merc had their engine on the Dyno since 2008, and were pushing the rules towards an engine formula they favoured. They totally mugged off the rest of F1 with an engine that had 15% more power than the rest of the grid.
It made Williams second best for god's sake - how can you possibly compare 2022 to the engine formula failure that gifted a very good driver 80 wins, and wrongly propelled him into "great" territory?This is just completely ridiculous. 15% more power! Man come on!Merc had their engine on the Dyno since 2008, and were pushing the rules towards an engine formula they favoured. They totally mugged off the rest of F1 with an engine that had 15% more power than the rest of the grid.
You know McLaren and Force India had a Mercedes engines as well? Yet they finished 5th a 6th respectively. And also Williams wasn't 2nd best, they finished 3rd.It made Williams second best for god's sake...
I realize you can be one of those fans who despise Mercedes, but common, let's just be more objective please. Let's just not pull out completely dumbfounded numbers.
It is not double standards. 2014 was based on the smart idea of the split turbo. It was one single idea that made the difference, cemented by the token system. One could also say a nice exploit of a loophole. For something like that I would never use the word incompetent for the ones that did not find this loophole.
No he’s totally objective!F1Krof wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 14:12ChrisF1 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 11:26I assume you're a Hamilton/Mercedes fan?
Yes, one team won most of the races, but it was in no way anywhere near what Merc were doing in 2014-2016.
Others only won because of Merc failures. Ferrari and Mercedes won races on pure pace in 2022.
If Charles hadn't been throwing it off the road, and Ferrari been putting their car on the wrong strategy, we would have actually seen a good battle. If Merc hadn't taken 12 races to get on top of their car, we would have seen a good battle.
2023 will be closer than 2014-2016 ever was. 2023 was about people getting cars wrong with a new concept. 2014 was about people getting cars right, and still being a second off because they didn't have a Merc engine.
Edit: Also, 2014 became an engine formula as you ignored me saying before.
Merc had their engine on the Dyno since 2008, and were pushing the rules towards an engine formula they favoured. They totally mugged off the rest of F1 with an engine that had 15% more power than the rest of the grid.
It made Williams second best for god's sake - how can you possibly compare 2022 to the engine formula failure that gifted a very good driver 80 wins, and wrongly propelled him into "great" territory?This is just completely ridiculous. 15% more power! Man come on!Merc had their engine on the Dyno since 2008, and were pushing the rules towards an engine formula they favoured. They totally mugged off the rest of F1 with an engine that had 15% more power than the rest of the grid.
You know McLaren and Force India had a Mercedes engines as well? Yet they finished 5th a 6th respectively. And also Williams wasn't 2nd best, they finished 3rd.It made Williams second best for god's sake...
I realize you can be one of those fans who despise Mercedes, but common, let's just be more objective please. Let's just not pull out completely dumbfounded numbers.
BoP seems a terrible system to me. It's obviously intelligently designed but it just creates something new to game rather than really level the field. WEC anyway hasn't been particularly close with Toyota and everyone else far behind.Spoutnik wrote: ↑27 Feb 2023, 21:03F1 should became implement a BoP imo. Even with less wind tunnel time x2 (penalty + finished 1st) RB will be miles ahead. Watching F1 is like waiting for an empire to fall (Ferrari : 2000-2008, Red Bull : never really falled but had a Renault PU, Merc : 2014-2020).