Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
User avatar
Fil
0
Joined: 15 Jan 2007, 14:54
Location: Melbourne, Aus.

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

Sooo.... anyone remember anything else about this race?


I'm struggling to be honest.. i swear the race only lasted for one corner!



I felt really sorry for Petrov in losing points by his late bump with Alonso. He had a great weekend through quali and then raced really maturely, particularly early on under pressure in the train of the Mercs, Ferraris & Kubica, and deserved to be rewarded with a point.


Anyway, that's that off my chest. Back to the real Turkish GP.. Vettel & Webber.. #-o
Any post(s) made by this user are (semi-)educated opinion(s), based on random fact(s) blurred by the smudges of time.
Any fact(s) claimed by this user will be supplemented by a link to the original source of said fact(s).

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

I'd love to see what would happen if Ross Brawn were in Horner's place and see what kind of magic he could pull out of that Red Bull :mrgreen:
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

zenithbeach wrote:the important thing here i think is that Christian H said immediately after the race that it was mark's fault because he was slower than vettel. he implied that webber was told to let vettel pass (obviously in a code).

when webber was then interviewed and asked about this particular "information" he looked totally oblivious and confused. he was like "WTF, no way, nobody told me that" blah blah so basically it was a miscommunication on red bulls part.

its rather frustrating for both drivers i think, and i hope that - even though they seem to blame each other - incidents like that wont happen again! i mean look at how many points theyve lost! especially vettel shouldnt have been so aggressive, because, out of everyone, he should know the importance of every single point!

so the only comment i have to the crash is a big fat: duh!
Rubbish, this is what he said:
CHRISTIAN HORNER, Team Principal: “It’s disappointing for the team to have got into that position today. The one thing I always ask the drivers is that, yes, they can race each other, but give each other room, and that’s exactly what didn’t happen. They were too far over on the left, Sebastian got a run on the inside of Mark, but then came across too early. They didn’t give each other room; it’s as simple as that. It was a massively close race between us and the McLarens up until that point. We managed to get ourselves ahead with a better pit-stop and a better strategy for Sebastian and were first and second. Sebastian was a bit happier on the prime tyre than Mark and was looking quicker at that point in the race. He got a run on Mark up the inside and we saw what happened. It’s massively disappointing and the situation shouldn’t have occurred. To give McLaren 28 points on a plate is very frustrating for everyone in the team – especially after so much hard work. We’ve lost a lot of points today with what’s happened. We need to learn from it, so we don’t find ourselves in this position again.”
Horner is admitting Vettel screwed up!!
"In downforce we trust"

thestig84
thestig84
11
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 13:09

Re: Vodafone Mclaren Mercedes MP4/25

Post

autogyro wrote: I also still believe the RBs were sand bagging for the whole race for reliability reasons. They could have been way ahead.
McLaren will not catch the pace of the RBs with the technical direction they are on with the current car and it is to much and against the regulations to change completely.
If by sand bagging you mean managing the car to help reach the finish then Mclaren were 'sand bagging! from lap 18!! Button said he was told to save fuel from lap 20 and Lewis 2 laps earlier.

In my opinion neither team were sand bagging. They were managing their cars as effectively as possible to reach the end and in best position as always. I think Mclaren were a match for the rb6 yesterday and may have even pulled away in the clean air Webber was enjoying.

Ill try to remember you so confidently stating that Mclaren wont catch RedBull with their development path. MW reckons they are bringing average of 0.3-4 per race. My opinion is that they have every chance to overtake RedBull as the 25 is still being understood and more time can be found where as the rb6 is a well understood evolution and will be harder to keep on finding time.

User avatar
zenithbeach
0
Joined: 16 May 2010, 19:42

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

djos wrote:
Rubbish, this is what he said:

Horner is admitting Vettel screwed up!!
ehm i watched the interview straight after the race.. live! he definitely seemed to blame webber, though he kept saying "but i need to speak with the drivers first before i tie myself down". then he said how webber was slower and implied he shouldve let vettel pass.

i know what i saw dude, whatever he said later is obviously gonna differ from his immediate reaction :)

User avatar
zenithbeach
0
Joined: 16 May 2010, 19:42

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

by the way congrats to petrov for securing the fastest lap! how awesome is that haha

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

zenithbeach wrote:
djos wrote:
Rubbish, this is what he said:

Horner is admitting Vettel screwed up!!
ehm i watched the interview straight after the race.. live! he definitely seemed to blame webber, though he kept saying "but i need to speak with the drivers first before i tie myself down". then he said how webber was slower and implied he shouldve let vettel pass.

i know what i saw dude, whatever he said later is obviously gonna differ from his immediate reaction :)
What I posted above is from the Official RedBull press Release/team Quotes published by the FIA.
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
zenithbeach
0
Joined: 16 May 2010, 19:42

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

djos wrote:
What I posted above is from the Official RedBull press Release/team Quotes published by the FIA.
there you have it then, obviously the official release would differ and be more diplomatic.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

zenithbeach wrote:
djos wrote:
What I posted above is from the Official RedBull press Release/team Quotes published by the FIA.
there you have it then, obviously the official release would differ and be more diplomatic.
It may be more diplomatic but Horner is clearly apportioning blame to Vettel:
Sebastian got a run on the inside of Mark, but then came across too early.
it doesn't get any clearer than that!
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
zenithbeach
0
Joined: 16 May 2010, 19:42

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

djos wrote: it doesn't get any clearer than that!
indeed! and i agree with him though i dont see the point in arguing about whose fault it was cause it clearly doesnt change the outcome. i was merely pointing out the initial statements and the obvious team order that was failed to be handed down to webber by his race engineer.

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

zenithbeach wrote:by the way congrats to petrov for securing the fastest lap! how awesome is that haha
It proves just how much slower the RBs were going to ensure reliability.

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Vodafone Mclaren Mercedes MP4/25

Post

thestig84 wrote:
autogyro wrote: I also still believe the RBs were sand bagging for the whole race for reliability reasons. They could have been way ahead.
McLaren will not catch the pace of the RBs with the technical direction they are on with the current car and it is to much and against the regulations to change completely.
If by sand bagging you mean managing the car to help reach the finish then Mclaren were 'sand bagging! from lap 18!! Button said he was told to save fuel from lap 20 and Lewis 2 laps earlier.

In my opinion neither team were sand bagging. They were managing their cars as effectively as possible to reach the end and in best position as always. I think Mclaren were a match for the rb6 yesterday and may have even pulled away in the clean air Webber was enjoying.

Ill try to remember you so confidently stating that Mclaren wont catch RedBull with their development path. MW reckons they are bringing average of 0.3-4 per race. My opinion is that they have every chance to overtake RedBull as the 25 is still being understood and more time can be found where as the rb6 is a well understood evolution and will be harder to keep on finding time.
.3-.4s per race...omg ..by the end of the year they will lap the field by half distance... :shock:

User avatar
Poleman
1
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 19:25

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

What i see in Redbull's case is that,they still are a weak team with a strong car...They confirmed it again this weekend...They need more than a fast car and Adrian Newey to win championships they need a lot of dicipline and better way of racing management IMHO.

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Vodafone Mclaren Mercedes MP4/25

Post

Save fuel orders are usualy code to the drivers to conserve the car and to not take risks.
You are not telling me that all four front runners did not have sufficient fuel to complete the race at full chat are you?
Hamilton could not achieve an overtake on either Webber of Vettel.
Hamilton is probably the best overtaker in the business. To me this proves both RBs were not going flat out and McLaren were well aware of this.
McLaren have a good team, they would have coded the orders to the cars so as to ensure both Button and Hamilton did not push to hard so as not to over work the tyres and possibly make mistakes.

thestig84
thestig84
11
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 13:09

Re: Turkish GP 2010 - Istanbul Park

Post

autogyro wrote:
zenithbeach wrote:by the way congrats to petrov for securing the fastest lap! how awesome is that haha
It proves just how much slower the RBs were going to ensure reliability.
Not just red bull. It just show us that fastest laps mean less these days as its who is pushing at the end. Race winner only had 12th fastest lap. Petrov slapped on new tyres after his puncture as went for it in the last few laps. Means nothing nevertheless a great drive by him and a real shame Alonso just touched him. Seems Alonso was lucky too...

http://adamcooperf1.com/2010/05/31/luck ... in-turkey/