lebesset wrote:Shrieker wrote:basti313 wrote:
And we should not miss 20.5:
20.5 Manoeuvres liable to hinder other drivers, such as deliberate crowding of a car beyond the edge of the track or any other abnormal change of direction, are not permitted.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/ ... 9722_n.jpg
This code brown move on Rosberg is just not covered by the rules and if it would not have been the team mate every driver on the grid would have been whining at Charly in the radio.
.....
so now taking the normal racing line is deliberately crowding your opponent off the track , is it ? or do you think it is an abnormal change of direction ?
Do you think Hamilton is on the racing line in the picture? He was clearly right of the normal line (on the inside) and with this angle towards the track he would have cut the following corner. Rosberg is more or less on the racing line in this picture.
Classical closing of the door...I do not know how we should discuss about that.
lebesset wrote:
if that were the case there would be no motor racing !
if you try and overtake around the outside and cause a collision then you are culpable if the other driver keeps to the normal line
I am totally with you, that this is "normal" racing.
But I am talking about the F1 rules and nothing else. And these are concerning safety and overtaking sometimes strange. But for me it does not make sense to talk about what I want F1 to be, but only to talk about
how it is.
Phil wrote:basti313 wrote:Come on...you can not judge wheel to wheel racing on the basis who is crossing the racing line at the moment...
For me the rule is clear:
You are allowed to shut the door only before any piece of your opponent's car is next to you.
I think the main problem here would be that drivers have a very limited and narrow view of the track. Coming up on either side, either outside or inside is always problematic, because you are putting yourself in a vulnerable place. For this reason alone, I think the onus is on the driver attempting the overtake, because by definition, he has the better view and sees what the other car is doing.
I agree with you, but the rules do not. You remember this crazy pass of Massa against Senna in Singapur 2012? This is how the rules are and this is how Hamilton/Rosberg would have looked like if there would have been a wall.
Phil wrote:
Can a driver coming from behind, being on the outside into a corner expect the other driver to leave a car's width on corner exit? IMO - it depends, on how far alongside the car is.
If he is alongside enough to "make his mark", the other car, by definition will drive into his side if he attempts to close the door. If he isn't far enough inside and theoretically in his blind side, I don't think the responsibility is on the defending driver to leave room, but on the attacking driver to assess the situation, the closing gap and opt out of the manoeuver.
Yes. And Rosberg was clearly "alongside" as he had to steer off the track in several occasions.
Phil wrote:
To continue on your path then is futile, as you are 1.) in the blindspot and
Do you think Ham did not know where Rosberg was? I strongly doubt that.
Phil wrote:
2.) in a closing gap. Lewis vector was consistent - he didn't make any swerves outside, but simply took his line and was committed to the corner.
This again would be rather how I want racing to be, but this is not covered by the rules. They do not allow to simply take your line, but clearly say that there has to be room for the opponent next to you. With a wall or gravel this would look much different.
And for me it is very, very strange, that the rule that was introduced because of Bahrain, the rule that penalized Vettel in Monza 2012 or allowed Massa to hit Senna in Singapur 2012 now is completely invalid for Bahrain.