That might be true, but Horner is always doing this, building upon these catchy statements that are bound to live in people’s heads.
That might be true, but Horner is always doing this, building upon these catchy statements that are bound to live in people’s heads.
Yea Baku crossed my mind too but Baku ‘23 was just a minor floor update or a change in philosophy worth only a tenth if I recall, so I didn’t compare it to the massive Miami update.
It’s nice that he’s talking about Mclaren again, he might struggle though when Stella stone walls him after all he’s been used to Toto biting at all of horners bitching
No but it's a different team now and we know each big upgrade took about 2 months last year, so it fits. I think whether they do 2 or 3 upgrades might depend on wether they think they can keep upgrading this car into next year if the underlying changes are bigger and would require separate workstreams that aren't compatible with this years car.CjC wrote: ↑10 Jun 2024, 21:17Yea Baku crossed my mind too but Baku ‘23 was just a minor floor update or a change in philosophy worth only a tenth if I recall, so I didn’t compare it to the massive Miami update.
If only there was a contributor who chatted to some of the McLaren guys…, oh yea, there was and they were chased off by some members who I’ve never seen post on this thread again. Thank you
The race was so complicated to unravel, I think they're going to be slowly changing the narrative as they pick it apart.Seerix wrote: ↑10 Jun 2024, 11:02Curious Lando was saying in the post race interviews they did all they could, but the SC and slick pace were the reason for not winning.
However, later during the press conference he changed attitude and mentioned they could have won if the decision making and communication was better/faster.
If memory serves me well, next batch of upgrades will come at Silverstone.
I like his attitude very much. Not only did he keep his elbows out in a hard situation, he was also not the typical race car driver that always think he is faster than his teammate. Good job.Seerix wrote: ↑10 Jun 2024, 11:02I am liking Oscar's defense. He does not let people pass easily. Regarding driver preference. At one point towards the end, Tom even asked him if he could challenge VER, but Oscar only said he needs to focus on RUS behind. So it seems the team was willing to give him a go if he felt up for it.
They usually have these procedures, in most races the drivers are informed when they are in an SC window or VSC window, meaning automatic pit if there is a SC or VSC.CjC wrote: ↑10 Jun 2024, 11:27I know it’s easy for me in my arm chair to say but for me they need to change their procedure slightly, this is the second time umming and arrring has cost the shot at a win.
Perhaps there should be a new understanding where the team have a default option always made for the end of the current lap.
In this case ‘if there is a SC and our driver can dive into the pit lane we fit inter’.
Same procedure in a dry race, ‘if we pit this lap we fit the hards’ or in the late safety car scenario ‘if we pit now it’s for a soft’
I know it can’t be so automated all the time and decisions have to be made on the fly but yesterday it was pretty clear they were hanging on to the first set of inters to fit a new set once it started to rain- they had multiple lads to make the ‘default’ selection as I’m suggesting.
This!FittingMechanics wrote: ↑11 Jun 2024, 10:39But I do think the team should have been aware that the crash will likely turn into a SC and they should have been ready when SC was shown. That was an operational mistake.
Completely agreed. In previous years I felt that they need to take more risk - for example gamble that it will become a safety car as it looks like it will. Right now they probably don't need to do that as they have enough pace to win on merit but in Canada they had half a lap of time to come up with a plan between Sargeant crash and SC being deployed. That should be enough for a top tier team.Moving Chicane wrote: ↑11 Jun 2024, 11:51This!FittingMechanics wrote: ↑11 Jun 2024, 10:39But I do think the team should have been aware that the crash will likely turn into a SC and they should have been ready when SC was shown. That was an operational mistake.
I usually don't comment here, because others have far more knowledge than me, BUT I feel sometimes the Team should have a bit more common sense when making split-second decisions. For example: Crash from Sergant happened in a spot with difficult access. Sure, nobody knew if he was able to continue, but that should be an automatic trigger for the guys in the garage to get ready for a pit stop. Lando still had more than 1/2 of the lap to discuss the situation with the team.
https://ibb.co/9cTp3d8
I still have some resentment how the Team managed some of these 50/50 situations last year - Mexico red flag (KM crash), Brazil Q3, rain in Dutch GP, etc. Like the Team relies too much on data instead of looking in the sky/at the main TV feed/etc.
The original timetable for the first update was for Imola and brought forward by 2 weeks and Piastri got only half the upgrade.