McLaren has lost Hamilton a lot of points this year. They will probably lose him more as the year progresses. That's won't help his championship race.godlameroso wrote:Hamilton is staying put, at least for one more year. It doesn't make sense for him to leave, aside from Spa Germany and Valencia how many DNF's has Hamilton had this year? Hamilton will get more wins this year, and if he bags another title can't no one be mad at him. There's less than 50pts covering the top 5 drivers, and another potential 200pts to play for not to mention McLaren, Lotus, Ferrari, and Red Bull are all fighting for wins and taking points off each other.
And that was my point. If Ferrari and others were happy to hamper their performance, let them. If they continued not using KERS then McLaren would be in an advantage, Even if Ferrari decided to use KERS, the McLaren package was better. By agreeing to that stupid gentlemens agreement, McLaren didn't get anything when they could have contented for both championships. That's what I mean by Whitmarsh not having any balls.Coefficient wrote: The silly thing about your comment is that KERS was also in the regulations for all the teams including Ferrari yet they didn't use it either. Sometiems a Gentelmen's agreement is exactly that.
I think that is the real reason behind it. What I believe is that Lewis himself actually never sat down personally to negotiate a new contract, his management XIX Company really is doing that. We should not forget that company is from outside the F1. Most drivers have management who have experience and/or ties with F1, and within that last group of management, there is more of a "gentlemen protocol" where less extreme bluffs, like the one XIX is doing right now, are being played. Ted also mentions the bluff is badly played out, and I can follow that due the lack of knowledge XIX actually has from F1.Gerhardsa wrote: Ineresting article on skysports website by Ted Kravitz :
http://www1.skysports.com/formula-1/new ... t-McLaren-
This is not even close to the advantage Ferrari gave away in front of the 2006-season, when they agreed to limit their testing. While McLaren had spent their money on their technology center, Ferrari had invested in their own test track, right outside the factory and were thereby able to test at a much lower cost. Testing the car on track is definitely the most efficient way of developing the car and Ferrari built their success on this philosophy. In 2006 they then agreed to eliminate this advantage through a similar gentlemen's agreement. When they lost the title in the last two races, it was all down to reliability, which can be directly attributed to limited testing. A team that tests regularly as Ferrari used to do, is much less likely to experience reliability problems during the race weekend, simply because the problems will be discovered on the test track.internetf1fan wrote:And that was my point. If Ferrari and others were happy to hamper their performance, let them. If they continued not using KERS then McLaren would be in an advantage, Even if Ferrari decided to use KERS, the McLaren package was better. By agreeing to that stupid gentlemens agreement, McLaren didn't get anything when they could have contented for both championships. That's what I mean by Whitmarsh not having any balls.Coefficient wrote: The silly thing about your comment is that KERS was also in the regulations for all the teams including Ferrari yet they didn't use it either. Sometiems a Gentelmen's agreement is exactly that.
Well, I wouldn't say it is something akin to Briatore/Piquet Jr. at Renault.Gerhardsa wrote:ag no man, not match fixing in F1 as well...surely notSeijaKessen wrote:In addition, I find that most inquisitive minds find it somewhat peculiar that a team that hadn't won in quite sometime, suddenly has everything down when said team's, team principal happens to turn 70 years old. Something about that tire compound.zyphro wrote:
Here's a suggestion: watch the 2012 season again, from day one.
Maldonaldo not good in races? Remind me who's won a race again? Oh dear. His pace is not the problem, his race craft and his mindset is. The guy is bloody fast and doesn't know how to utilise his speed - week in week out. Whilst Senna is just consistently slow.
Of all the potential on paper moves, Schumacher going to Ferrari makes the most sense to me.Hail22 wrote:Perhaps as another poster mentioned, Schumacher may leave Mercedes to aid Ferrari in Development as well as giving Perez another year to further mature.
I personally think the possibility of Schumacher returning to Ferrari is zero. He, along with Todt, and to a lesser extent, Brawn were made to leave the team by di Montezemolo at that time.SeijaKessen wrote:Of all the potential on paper moves, Schumacher going to Ferrari makes the most sense to me.Hail22 wrote:Perhaps as another poster mentioned, Schumacher may leave Mercedes to aid Ferrari in Development as well as giving Perez another year to further mature.
He's forever going to be linked with Ferrari because it was the team he had the greatest impact on, and the most success with. It'd be a win-win situation for Ferrari in 2013 since they would now have a great 2nd driver, and in having that it would allow them to seriously contend for the constructor's title, which is not going to happen with Massa there IMO.