lolTim.Wright wrote:Sorry, post 2008 cars aren't eligible for that prize
monster of car we have here, features are like expected, if PER is as good as they think and if 2013 Pirelli are as fragile like they say , than we have a winner here.
lolTim.Wright wrote:Sorry, post 2008 cars aren't eligible for that prize
tedkravitz wrote: But they've covered up the nose step - here's what it looks like uncovered.
a bit late to the "modesty panel" discussion here I see...gibells wrote:Sorry, getting a bit confused here. Could anyone explain what advantage McLaren would have in building a stepped nose and placing a cover over it? I understand the advantage of raising the nose, but how is there any benefit in a cover when the tip of the nose must be at the same height?
@ Richard. Yes I can see the benefits of a smooth nose. And I understand the concept of a smaller cross section. But surely adding a cover to a stepped nose dissolves the latter?richard_leeds wrote:Presumably they believe the benefit of a smoother profile is greater than the disadvantage of a bigger cross section.
Remember last year they thought a lower smooth nose was better than a higher stepped nose. So they obviously see significant benefits in the smooth profile. This year gives them the best of both.