boo, low blow!GoranF1 wrote:One of the reasons Mclaren might beat Ferrari in Monaco is a fact that Fernando Alonso is significantly better driver than Ferrari pair.
boo, and I thought the car was goint to be better! booGoranF1 wrote:My last statement is based on 2014 FA teammate's score against Vettel this year.....
in 2017 it COULD happen. that's true. but we'll seeGoranF1 wrote:Ferrari will fall behind Redbull now whit this new Renault engine....Mclaren is next in line to catch them....soon very soon.
please point out to me where its quite clear...GoranF1 wrote:I think its quite clear Mclaren has better chassis than Ferrari but i to dont think Mclaren will beat them in Monaco because even there 80bhp deficit means something.F1NAC wrote:They did some setup changes which basically compromised their pace in Q. That doesn't mean that they will be beaten by McLaren in Monaco. That's ridiculous.GoranF1 wrote: Up until Q? ...thats when it matters no?
Ferrari was slower in sector 3 to Redbull,Mercedes and Mclaren...tyre wise Ferrari has problems on a smooth track whit tyre temps....Monaco is the smootest of all according to Pirelli.
But it will be closer than usual.
Ricciardo will win.
Ok we will not predict what will happen in Monaco in Monaco thread.hollus wrote:Getlemen, F1opinion.net is over there (a bit further back... a bit further back!).
Does every thread really need constant ying-yang, my hero is better that yours?
Do we need constant performance predictions in every thread? Is that really what you liked about F1T when you found it?
Lol you can say that again. The anti-ying-yang people are even more annoying than the ying-yang people sometimes. Nothing but nagging. Lets cal them Ning-nangs.GoranF1 wrote:Ok we will not predict what will happen in Monaco in Monaco thread.hollus wrote:Getlemen, F1opinion.net is over there (a bit further back... a bit further back!).
Does every thread really need constant ying-yang, my hero is better that yours?
Do we need constant performance predictions in every thread? Is that really what you liked about F1T when you found it?
PlatinumZealot wrote:Lol you can say that again. The anti-ying-yang people are even more annoying than the ying-yang people sometimes. Nothing but nagging. Lets cal them Ning-nangs.GoranF1 wrote:Ok we will not predict what will happen in Monaco in Monaco thread.hollus wrote:Getlemen, F1opinion.net is over there (a bit further back... a bit further back!).
Does every thread really need constant ying-yang, my hero is better that yours?
Do we need constant performance predictions in every thread? Is that really what you liked about F1T when you found it?
One group has driven off most of the best posters on the forum any guess which one it is.PlatinumZealot wrote:Lol you can say that again. The anti-ying-yang people are even more annoying than the ying-yang people sometimes. Nothing but nagging. Lets cal them Ning-nangs.GoranF1 wrote:Ok we will not predict what will happen in Monaco in Monaco thread.hollus wrote:Getlemen, F1opinion.net is over there (a bit further back... a bit further back!).
Does every thread really need constant ying-yang, my hero is better that yours?
Do we need constant performance predictions in every thread? Is that really what you liked about F1T when you found it?
I whole heartedly thank and appreciate the mods. This is not a bash on anybody just my thoughts about what has happened at f1 technical over the last year.flynfrog wrote:One group has driven off most of the best posters on the forum any guess which one it is.PlatinumZealot wrote:Lol you can say that again. The anti-ying-yang people are even more annoying than the ying-yang people sometimes. Nothing but nagging. Lets cal them Ning-nangs.GoranF1 wrote: Ok we will not predict what will happen in Monaco in Monaco thread.