I think problem with buttons IRL, is that you momentarily loose the thumb-grip of the wheel, which could be a disadvantage.
Paddles can of course be operated by any finger.
A very astute comment - after all, we originally developed opposing thumbs to allow us to hold steering wheels.xpensive wrote:I think problem with buttons IRL, is that you momentarily loose the thumb-grip of the wheel, which could be a disadvantage.
Paddles can of course be operated by any finger.
'Tally-ho' = change upautogyro wrote:Of course it could be made to be voice actuated (within the regulations?)
I can see that happening, "What a boooring race, wonder if that pit-babe with the boobs is still there...?"bazanaius wrote:Just full on mind control - obviously open to hilarious consequences when the driver's mind begins to wander..
I can't see how a digital control can be less precise? You press the button/paddle all the way - it changes state/sends a signal.Because the button is only operated over part of the lever movement, it is in fact less precise.
Changing gear in corners would be easy with a CV torque constant shift system.Mystery Steve wrote:When I was still doing Formula SAE, we used thumb buttons on the steering wheel for shifting. It wasn't as bad as you might think, and I think I would have actually preferred it in those cars. Although, I never drove a paddle shift in those cars, but I couldn't see it being that different. Gripping the wheel while shifting wasn't really an issue because you shouldn't be shifting while cornering anyway unless you're trying to "pull a Piquet."
It really is an ergo thing and nothing else. If you prefer paddles then run paddles, or if you prefer a thumb button run a thumb button. It doesn't matter from a mechanical/electrical design point of view. I see the argument for paddles on an F1 wheel just to make room for the other controls, though.
Side note: Is there a way to manually control image size on here? Sometimes it's nice to post a picture, but I don't want to take up the entire screen...