Miguel wrote:Pandamasque wrote:Miguel wrote:2) Only ricers run multiple HD's in RAID 0. Real men use RAID 5. Else you end up having more frequent HD failures. Read performance is identical, write performance is slightly worse in RAID 5, but reliability is soooo much better it isn't even funny.
Can you translate that to riser language, please?
I have 2 physical HD's (sata 250GB + old ide 80GB) but I have no idea what you are talking about. How do I check what sort of RAID it is running and how to change that?
To add a few things to Miguel answer, in english.
- To get
RAID you should:
1. Have
identical disks (all of the same capacity).
2. Have a RAID capable
disk controller OR get an
operating system that is RAID capable, like
Linux, Microsoft Server or MacOSX (altough Mac only gives you RAID 0 and 1, I think). All flavors of
BSD (Net, Free and Open BSD) and
Solaris (Open and 10) also have RAID 5.
In short, unless you're a wizard that spends 3.000 dollars in your PC (yeah, I know YOU don't need that, but I'm mortal) you need a SERVER.
- To get
RAID 5 (which I also recommend, as is practically the only way you use RAID with a regular server) you need to have
three disks at least.
Of course, it would be frankly stupid (to "pull a FIA") if you get RAID but you don't have a continous electrical source (an UPS).
Me?
I use Nero BackItUP and NEVER have lost data in MY LIFE. I still have ALL the data I've produced since 1983 (I still have the Tandy Operating System. Heck, I even have Visicalc! What's Visicalc? What came before Lotus 1-2-3. What's Lotus 1-2-3? Oh, forget it).