Never say never. Who was (or still is ?) building Renault engines ?cossie wrote:no one is going to buy a Mechachrome badged as a VW
And just few years back some were laughing parties are the only thing Red Bull can do right.
Never say never. Who was (or still is ?) building Renault engines ?cossie wrote:no one is going to buy a Mechachrome badged as a VW
You really believe VW would put a a man with a track record a horrendous as Pollock in charge of their F1 engine operation. Even just as a cover Pollock could screw the whole thing up. I also don't think Gilles Simon is the one man band you are making him out to be.xpensive wrote:What I belive is that P.U.R.E was a VW cover-operation from the start, which would more easily xplain Simon's hasty leaving from the FIA without any "gardening leave" demanded by his boss, Jean Todt, the new rules were primarily aimed at VW afterall.
If that is the case, Red Bull Racing is already in on it and will switch to VW for the 2014 season.
- Mechacrome fits the bill as VW don't have the know-how or facilities for such developments anyway.
- Pollock fits the bill because he's a notorious wheeler and dealer who nobody takes serious anyway.
How would VW justify the cost to their shareholders? Every penny needs accounting, even R+D is split to show where every euro is spent. They cannot hide this, it would need to have been green lit by the board and shareholders, and shareholders are notorious for not keeping things quiet.xpensive wrote:VW is just picking up the tab at the moment, nothing else, involvement will come if and when the engine shows some promise.
No risk at all.
I'm not talking about the build time of the engine, but the total time (man hours) needed to make one engine. It is that time that costs money.PhillipM wrote:The material and build labour will be a downright drop in the ocean compared to the machine setups, jigs, moulds, testing and development costs.Edis wrote: And no, the extra cost is not only material but mostly in the number of hours required to make the engine.
Unforunatly Reynard's involvement cost him his company and sale of it in bankruptcy court at the time when his chassis in CART was the dominate chassis in the series. Then Pollack started a CART team which the weasel Kevin Kalkovian. The original premise on that was to get Villeanuve back in the series and when that failed the team has had a steady supply of pay drivers.xpensive wrote:Besides, Pollock's track record is really not that bad when you think about it. His success with his BAR team was limited in relation to money spent, that much is true, but it should not be forgotten that he had to trust Adrian Reynard as technical director, when he was a partner in crime, gifting the team with Malcolm Oastler as chief designer without prior F1 xperience.
It seems to me that the Scotsman has learned his lesson on the importance of the technical side by now?
Utter rubbish, Reynard's bancrupcy had nothing to do with BAR, but a most ill-adviced attempt at an introduction on NYSE and an un-wise Riley & Scott buy-out.cossie wrote:Unforunatly Reynard's involvement cost him his company and sale of it in bankruptcy court at the time when his chassis in CART was the dominate chassis in the series. Then Pollack started a CART team which the weasel Kevin Kalkovian. The original premise on that was to get Villeanuve back in the series and when that failed the team has had a steady supply of pay drivers.xpensive wrote:Besides, Pollock's track record is really not that bad when you think about it. His success with his BAR team was limited in relation to money spent, that much is true, but it should not be forgotten that he had to trust Adrian Reynard as technical director, when he was a partner in crime, gifting the team with Malcolm Oastler as chief designer without prior F1 xperience.
It seems to me that the Scotsman has learned his lesson on the importance of the technical side by now?
I'm not going to get in a pissing contest with you, BTW you kinda spelled other and bankruptcy wrong(hint, hint) . Any way here's what happened to Mr.Reynard and his company taken from wilkipediaxpensive wrote:Utter rubbish, Reynard's bancrupcy had nothing to do with BAR, but a most ill-adviced attempt at an introduction on NYSE and an un-wise Riley & Scott buy-out.cossie wrote:Unforunatly Reynard's involvement cost him his company and sale of it in bankruptcy court at the time when his chassis in CART was the dominate chassis in the series. Then Pollack started a CART team which the weasel Kevin Kalkovian. The original premise on that was to get Villeanuve back in the series and when that failed the team has had a steady supply of pay drivers.xpensive wrote:Besides, Pollock's track record is really not that bad when you think about it. His success with his BAR team was limited in relation to money spent, that much is true, but it should not be forgotten that he had to trust Adrian Reynard as technical director, when he was a partner in crime, gifting the team with Malcolm Oastler as chief designer without prior F1 xperience.
It seems to me that the Scotsman has learned his lesson on the importance of the technical side by now?
Oher than that I advice you to pay some attention at the spelling of names of people involved, it gives more credibility.