I have since retracted that question and I apologise, it was not called for.natef1 wrote:Am I thick?
Well done =D>
I am not going to enter a petulant argument with you.
I have since retracted that question and I apologise, it was not called for.natef1 wrote:Am I thick?
Well done =D>
I am not going to enter a petulant argument with you.
C'mon Guy's is this really so hard to figure out?Sawtooth-spike wrote:But you point was that, "WOW they are fast", Which we said means nothing till sunday. Now your saying the same thing?djos wrote: Maybe if you watched F1 closely you'd understand me?
Allow me to put it simply for you; all season RBR & BGP have been roughly front-mid pack thru out most free-practise sessions, this time both teams are up the front by a country mile and considering the way go about their weekends, I believe this is a very ominous sign for all the other teams.
I am confused, Maybe i have miss read something somewhere.
Thank you Soli, that is exactly my point.SoliRossi wrote:I think what djos is saying is if we are on teh same strategy as usual we are in good shape.
Our normal friday strat puts us in the midfield as we dont go for glory runs, ie we have lots of fuel and dont push the limits ala Williams.
Now if we are on the same strategy, which would be likley we are getting a better lap time in comparison to the field, without trying for it.
Ok, thanks for your modesty and your apology. It's not often you get people on the internet who will apologise.djos wrote:I have since retracted that question and I apologise, it was not called for.natef1 wrote:Am I thick?
Well done =D>
I am not going to enter a petulant argument with you.
No Worries, I forgot my manners for a bit there.natef1 wrote:Ok, thanks for your modesty and your apology. It's not often you get people on the internet who will apologise.djos wrote:I have since retracted that question and I apologise, it was not called for.natef1 wrote:Am I thick?
Well done =D>
I am not going to enter a petulant argument with you.
We all understand we have different opinions, which should be constructive
Im not so sure about that but Im always happy to apologise when in the wrong (as I was on this occasion).SoliRossi wrote:Bravo djos, good effort mate.
That must be the silver lining.SoliRossi wrote:ah mate, weahter you were wrong or not i have no idea, but for someone to say sorry its a good charachter trait.
I am no aero guy, but definitely a front upgrade in an effort to clean up the airflow for the revised DDD. The Monaco spec was basically a bolt on DDD with nothing done upstream.zgred wrote:modbaraban wrote:
Wider nose?
Yes, there are little elements:BreezyRacer wrote:Nice image of the rear.
I lightened it up in my browser (Firefox) using the Pixlr add on (it's great for photoshopping online images, etc)
If you brighten it up you can see quite a bit of detail. It looks like, primarily, the outer sections of the diffuser were widened out, but also MAYBE the bodywork before the upper diffuser exit was raised. Hard to tell based on just this one pic. Should be an exciting weekend.
I would like to see if the splitter was changed to something closer to the Brawn design.