I'd believe you if you stated: "I wouldnt be surprised if they are not at the back of the grid in Melbourne"elMaestro wrote:They've been so competitive these last 5 years that even if they didnt turn a wheel at these last 3 tests i wouldnt be surprised if they would be at the front of the grid in Melbourne
Id agree if it was another team or another designer but its Adrian Newey, and underestimating him right now would be the worst thing to do!Jef Patat wrote:I'd believe you if you stated: "I wouldnt be surprised if they are not at the back of the grid in Melbourne"elMaestro wrote:They've been so competitive these last 5 years that even if they didnt turn a wheel at these last 3 tests i wouldnt be surprised if they would be at the front of the grid in Melbourne
Law number one in every engineering discipline: the proof of the pudding is in the eating.
Ok bob poor wording on my part, just wondering why Ferrari, Mercedes, went for the triangle shape while Rb10 went for ellipse....beelsebob wrote:What's obvious about that? Why would a circle be better here? Are we going to fall back to discussions about ellipses?Hobbs04 wrote:I've noticed only Fw36 and Rb10 have round air box inlets. Not sure where but I remember hearing that the triangle shape inlet ala F14T was due to engine resonation or vibrations. Obviously a circle is aero friendly but I haven't quite wrapped my head around how an air box shape could have that effect.
That would be my guess - those tubes are maybe as big in diameter as a garden hose and certainly useless for pure cooling purposes.Postmoe wrote:djos wrote:That isn't for cooling, that is to vent fluid or gases when something goes wrong (eg battery failures) .... All IMO of course.
Then... ¿Are they putting one inlet and one outlet to help those fluid exit if the failureoccurs on the track?
They certainly aren't. The inlet is positioned directly inside the massive airflow around the sidepod. If it's indeed a case of a hot spot - a concentrated area where heat adds up quickly - the amount of fresh air might certainly be enough to help. What I am not so sure about is the reasoning behind the outlet.djos wrote:That would be my guess - those tubes are maybe as big in diameter as a garden hose and certainly useless for pure cooling purposes.Postmoe wrote:djos wrote:That isn't for cooling, that is to vent fluid or gases when something goes wrong (eg battery failures) .... All IMO of course.
Then... ¿Are they putting one inlet and one outlet to help those fluid exit if the failureoccurs on the track?
What goes in must come out right?BorisTheBlade wrote:Thanks for stating the obvious. What I meant was this: IMHO such an outlet only makes sense if the air from the inlet doesn't add to the internal airflow. That in return would mean that they are cooling a totally separated area - which for me is hard to believe.
But they have some clever guys so they will know what they are doing.