It would be because of internal "honeycomb" areas that are impossible to machine / cast / forged into the piston.Mudflap wrote: ↑06 Jul 2017, 02:28This is what really baffles me about the 3D printing rumors.
It implies that the piston is either an enclosed honeycomb/ fancy oil gallery or has some sort of massive undercuts that just can't be machined after forging. The problem with these is that the 'dry' honeycomb is poor at conducting heat, while any complicated geometry that involves oil circulation is very inefficient.
A few years ago I looked at gallery cooled steel pistons and the fill ratio of the galleries was as low as 30% with squirt jets pointing straight at the inlets. Not only that, but oil circulation was very poor too, as at high engines speeds the oil was sticking to the walls and was not being displaced by fresh 'cool' oil.
I can hardly imagine anything better than an 'open' structure that is saturated by a dozen cooling nozzles.
Maybe 3D printing is just used for convenience, surely it must be a lot faster than having to wait on forging tooling for every single iteration ? Several suppliers offer powdered sintered tool steels with proof strength in excess of 2GPA and excellent cleanliness, can't see why similar quality can't be achieved with SLS/SLM.
3D Printing (I'm assuming in this case a powder bed layup type of machine) will generally be slower. But what you gain from it is the ability to print things that would otherwise be impossible to machine or to reduce the number of components down from many to 1.