Team-mate battles, Turkey
Qualification
Race - Fastest lap
Race - Average lap (net: 1st lap, in-laps and out-laps excluded)
More on F1news.cz:
http://f1news.cz/novinky/34882-jak-dopa ... v-turecku/
If you watched every moment of it, you must have left the room during Practice 2 on Friday afternoon. You might like to check who was faster out of the two during this session.WhiteBlue wrote:Demonstrable reality.... my ass! Vettel was faster in every free practise and quali session, actually in every stint of qualifying until his suspension broke. This covered 7.9 hours of driving on Friday and Saturday. I watched every minute of it. You have no idea what you are talking about.Gary wrote:Oh dear... I'm sorry but those two assertions are a triumph of fanboyism over demonstrable reality. Terrific fun to read though. That'll have me chuckling all day.WhiteBlue wrote:Agreed that Red Bull screwed up and don't know how to sell it. I disagree with the assessment that they wanted Vettel to win. What if Vettel was simply faster all weekend and they wanted the faster guy at the front? Webber's pole was a fluke. Vettel was faster but his suspension failure put him in the wrong position for the race. That was the problem they were trying to cure.
WhiteBlue wrote:Agreed that Red Bull screwed up and don't know how to sell it. I disagree with the assessment that they wanted Vettel to win. What if Vettel was simply faster all weekend and they wanted the faster guy at the front? Webber's pole was a fluke. Vettel was faster but his suspension failure put him in the wrong position for the race. That was the problem they were trying to cure.
Gary wrote: Oh dear... I'm sorry but those two assertions are a triumph of fanboyism over demonstrable reality. Terrific fun to read though. That'll have me chuckling all day.
If you believe you watched every moment of it, you must have left the room or nodded off during Practice 2 on Friday afternoon. You might like to check who was faster out of the two during this session.WhiteBlue wrote:Demonstrable reality.... my ass! Vettel was faster in every free practise and quali session, actually in every stint of qualifying until his suspension broke. This covered 7.9 hours of driving on Friday and Saturday. I watched every minute of it. You have no idea what you are talking about.
Beg your pardon for my slip in FP2. I really must have napped there shortly. They did four stints each and Webber set a fastest time in his third stint. The three other stints of FP2 Vettel was faster.Gary wrote:If you believe you watched every moment of it, you must have left the room or nodded off during Practice 2 on Friday afternoon. You might like to check who was faster out of the two during this session.
In Q1, Webber was late out due to throttle problems encountered during P3.
Note, too that Webber was faster than Vettel on both runs in Q3, Vettel's roll bar linkage problem only arising late in Q3.
Obviously for the team leadership it only mattered who they thought was the faster driver on the day and they did not care about the "minor" issue that nominally Webber had had pole.mysticF1 wrote:whether or not Vettels qual was compromised or not is totally irrelavant, these things happen...Webber got pole and defended against Hami in the early part of the race brilliantly...he deserved the lead and the possible win.
I guess we all agree that team orders were in effect at Red Bull. But I cannot say the above points are convincing me. I will look at them separately:Gary wrote:No good reasons, as you say... but two reasons.Jersey Tom wrote:I just have a hard time believing it.
There's no logical reason, with Mark 1st and Seb 2nd, to try to flip the results. Doesn't particularly matter to the race engineers if its Webber - Vettel or Vettel - Webber.
Why would they want Vettel to win that bad? I see no good reason, and those managers are sharp guys.
- The brand positioning of Red Bull the drink and Vettel's age and boyish good looks.
- Marko's position as the manager of the driver development program.
So you're saying that Red Bull management told an engineer to tell Webber on the radio where the FIA could hear, to let Vettel by?Webber who was supposed to be told by his race engineer to let Vettel by
I'm not dreaming. Just read the stuff in the thread!strad wrote:So you're saying that Red Bull management told an engineer to tell Webber on the radio where the FIA could hear, to let Vettel by?Webber who was supposed to be told by his race engineer to let Vettel by
HA! Not likely...How do you dream this stuff up?
Helmut Marko wrote:The race engineer (Pilbeam) received the order to explain to him (Webber) what was going on...
If you do not trust me with a literal translation have your own expert give you a translation. The plan by the Red Bull management to issue team order is well documented in the German language publications. It was also broadcasted by both German TV teams RTL and SKY. Marko did not hide what he and Horner were doing. If there ever is an FiA investigation they have plenty of material witnesses and quotations. Reb Bull will not be able to get that particular genie back into it's bottle.Helmut Marko wrote:The message to Webber should have read:"You are too slow. At this speed Hamilton can't be kept behind you. Preserve your car and if Vettel is faster don't fight him and focus on Hamilton."
In Turkey the drivers were under massive pressure by the McLaren drivers and particularly Hamilton. In Silverstone the Bull of Vettel was 15s ahead of Webber and 41s ahead of Ruben's Brawn controlling the gap throughout the race.D'Leh wrote:In Silverstone last year Webber was faster than Vettel all weekend too. Only in Q3 Vettel fluked ahead of him with some help from Räikkönen. Red Bull didn't care about it and didn't try to doctor the result in Webber's favour back then, despite Webber being faster. Why would they suddenly do it in Turkey 2010?
Not saying Mark can't be diplomatic, but to be fair that could've been written by PR expertsdjos wrote:You know Vettel could learn a few things from Mark about diplomacy and team spirit by watching this video:
http://www.redbull.com/cs/Satellite/en_ ... 2855170930
At this early point in the race the situation was not quite so clear cut. Plus it would have meant that Webber would loose time. That was not desirable. They obviously decided to use the moment when the drivers would detune their engines to get Vettel past Webber. It shows that they did not want to doctor the results at any cost but wanted the faster driver on P1. At least everything is consistent with that theory.raymondu999 wrote:I don't quite buy the doctored result thing though. Vettel was very close to webber after the stops. If they wanted to doctor the result shouldn't Mark very conveniently have had a pitstop problem?
Yes. But until this last two laps Webber was consistently faster.WhiteBlue wrote:At this early point in the race the situation was not quite so clear cut. Plus it would have meant that Webber would loose time. That was not desirable. They obviously decided to use the moment when the drivers would detune their engines to get Vettel past Webber. It shows that they did not want to doctor the results at any cost but wanted the faster driver on P1. At least everything is consistent with that theory.raymondu999 wrote:I don't quite buy the doctored result thing though. Vettel was very close to webber after the stops. If they wanted to doctor the result shouldn't Mark very conveniently have had a pitstop problem?