mach11 wrote:Btw... Any pics of the metal from vettel's car flying out once his engine blew up???... (that is what is being reported)...
mach11 wrote:Btw... Any pics of the metal from vettel's car flying out once his engine blew up???... (that is what is being reported)...
I think Alonso would have got past anyway. hamilton was having tyre problems so I think is was a queation of when not if.Shrieker wrote:10 million dollar (literally) question: Could Hamilton have kept Alonso at bay had he not ran out of track ? I guess we'll never know...
Alonso would have sailed past Hamilton. Did you see Alonso's tyres at the end of the race? They still had visible tread patterns where Hamilton was near bald.Shrieker wrote:10 million dollar (literally) question: Could Hamilton have kept Alonso at bay had he not ran out of track ? I guess we'll never know...
andrew wrote:...Suffice to say that the majority of the drivers so far seemed to think stopping early was not a ridiculous idea.
Alonso btw was lucky to avoid a penalty for setting a purple third sector time under yellow after Petrow crashed his Renault in lap 41 at the pit entry. It appears that everybody was too busy to notice it.FiA press conference wrote:Q: Felipe, give us your read on the conditions today. A bit of night driving at the end and what third place means to you and the Ferrari team.
Felipe Massa: Well, it means good points for the team. It means a good race in very difficult conditions as at the end it definitely was very, very dark. Even though we have a very strong light in the steering wheel, which was very, very strong, it was difficult to see in front as it was coming very strong on your face.
For good measure they could've added, "We're also confident it had nothing to do with the Red Bull team using our engine as an air pump for their massive diffuser. We never cringe when we hear the sound their car makes off-throttle."xpensive wrote:I'm sure Renault wanted to post something like; "It's a crying shame that Vettel with his aggressive driving ruined our engine"
That's the problem. They don't keep breaking.Shrieker wrote:One has to ask why the Renault engines on the Bulls keep breaking, but the ones on Renault cars haven't once (AFAIK) broken this season.
Its called luck, sometimes you have and other times you don't. Additionally for the record I do believe that MW did have a gearbox failure (filings found in oil)at the Canadian GP prior to the race. He was able to change his g-box out at the expense of 5 grid spot penalty. I also recall in 2009 Mark had a front brake failure at Singapore.zeph wrote:I do not understand why people are saying the RBR is fragile/unreliable.
Mark Webber has finished with points in all but two races and those DNF's were because of crashes, not mechanical failures.
It's only Vettel's stuff that breaks...
[now stepping aside for incoming torrent of "poor Vettel" conspiracy theories in 5,4,3,2,1...]
andrew wrote:Several drivers it seems wanted the race stopped. In fact there was only one driver I can recall during the post-race interviews who laughed about the possibility of the race stopping early but his mentality over this issue proved to me once again that he is an immature idiot who still feels the need to act up to the camereas..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_wordandrew wrote:Laugh is maybe too strong a word but they certainly found the idea of stopping early laughable but I'm not mentioning names. Suffice to say that the majority of the drivers so far seemed to think stopping early was not a ridiculous idea.
So explain why in the RB5 and now RB6 Vettel keeps having engine* failures and Webber doesn't?Rob01 wrote:For those saying that Vettel killed his engine. That is not possible with a modern day F1 engine. The engine management system will NOT allow a driver to kill the engine. It goes up in smoke on it's own.