Congratulations to Matteo for great victory. I was just amazed your car performance.I must carefuly
look at your car
And yes also congratulation to Variante. Welcome back on top .
Thank you! We are repeating the same struggle of MVRC2016, who knows how will it end this time?
Hi, I also had a small difference in Cl*A (0,1 less) comparing the standard simulation (2500 iterations) to the longer simulation (3500 iteration). Using the same number of iterations my local analysis and the official one produce almost identical results.AratzH wrote: ↑26 Sep 2017, 18:40I just got the official results I somehow there is a -0.189 difference in Df ,0.001 in drag and 0.07 in COP compared with my results. I thought it was because the official run was 1000 iterations longer, but it seems that some of the residual plots differ noticeably. I'm pretty sure I ran with V2017-9. Is there a way to check that? Any other reason this could have happened?
Presumably if/when you do this the HE parameters will change so that the cars' side pods remain realistic sizes... so even though they'll be leant over at an angle their face area (measured perpendicular to their surface) will be greater than present?
Thanks! I think that 7.5 would be possible, but not for me
I don't think the sidepods dimensions would change very much, I am considering (in a very preliminary design) an inclination of about 30÷45°and the sidepods external surface would not change that much.