It looks like a clever way off using it as both plenum , and a protection chamber/shield to catch any parts that may be released from a catastrophic compressor event.
Rob
Looks to be between the v tho Scarbs. Between cylinders 1 and 4 to be precise.scarbs wrote:Heres a rough pic .. https://twitter.com/ScarbsF1/status/589 ... 18432?s=09
He said axial flow turbine - not compressor. That is more believable.trinidefender wrote:I keep hearing this axial flow compressor theory floating around but nobody has provided any actual proof around it. The problem comes with axial flow compressors being limited to about 1.4:1 per stage. As engines are limited to single stage compression in the turbocharger I don't see how this is possible. Experimental axial flow compressors have reached in the 1.6:1 to 1.8:1 but these tend to have very narrow operating ranges and would not be well suited to the changing conditions present in F1.
I think an axial flow turbine vs inward flow radial turbine, as is seen on conventional turbochargers is the much more likely scenario.
Think the original poster meant an axial compressor within the V as we only see the exit pipe out of the compressor to the intercooler with the gold heat shieldingwuzak wrote:He said axial flow turbine - not compressor. That is more believable.trinidefender wrote:I keep hearing this axial flow compressor theory floating around but nobody has provided any actual proof around it. The problem comes with axial flow compressors being limited to about 1.4:1 per stage. As engines are limited to single stage compression in the turbocharger I don't see how this is possible. Experimental axial flow compressors have reached in the 1.6:1 to 1.8:1 but these tend to have very narrow operating ranges and would not be well suited to the changing conditions present in F1.
I think an axial flow turbine vs inward flow radial turbine, as is seen on conventional turbochargers is the much more likely scenario.
They cut cylinders for part load operation.johnny comelately wrote:in Alonso's car the Honda was stuttering like traction control was in operation when he gave it some throttle, any thoughts?
They look variable to me, look at the rods, those look like linear actuation to me.PlatinumZealot wrote:Is it now safe to say that the compressor is not on the front face of the engine?
I can see the intake runners curling back in on themselves... like a scroll type design.. I am not sure if they are variable length from the limited view though.
Would that be permitted?WilliamsF1 wrote:Maybe Honda borrowed a scroll compressor from a GTI
http://www.matey-matey.com/images/g-werks/DSC00224.jpg
salva021291 wrote:i think that certainly the compressor is in front of engine but it is not all in the V. Already the dimension of compressor is large enough and we must consider also the tube of intercooler that should leave the compressor in a very little space. From the photo that we have we can see taht the tube of intercoler are not very little.
On the other hand i think also that in the V is not the best place for the compressor considering the heat that is in the V.