Just_a_fan wrote: ↑02 Aug 2022, 11:00
Andres125sx wrote: ↑02 Aug 2022, 07:28
Just_a_fan wrote: ↑31 Jul 2022, 14:11
Which is why I said George did a great job getting the car to perform for him.
I disagree that a driver can achieve a higher result than the car is capable of. All the driver can do is get as close to the car's maximum performance as possible. A driver can improve the car's position in a race by clever racing/strategy, yes, but the car has a single inherent best possible lap time no matter who is driving it - it's just that some drivers don't get as close to that time as others do.
The best drivers are the ones that are most consistently able to get close to a car's best possible lap time at any stage and do so lap after lap. That's what sets the Michaels, the Ayrtons, the Fernandos, the Lewises, the Maxes apart from the rest - the ability to get more of a car's performance for more of the time. Think about Lewis chasing down Max in Hungary or Max doing the same to Lewis in France. Both great drives, yes, but it was because they just drove the car as close to its available performance for lap after lap - they weren't driving faster than the car was capable. Michael used to be great at that - Brawn would tell him "you need 5 qualifying-style laps before pitting" and Michael would do 5 qualifying-style laps. No one "out drives" the car (or any other silliness that the media love to say to promote a narrative).
What if Russell gets 98% out of his car, and the rivals get 95%, so despite Mercedes is a slower car Rusell manage to put it on pole?
I said that - drivers can get more out of a car than others might.
I´ve never used the term outdrive or whatever, but since drivers are not robots, yes, a really good lap can put X car higher than it should really be, if the driver did it better that the rest of drivers, or if they did some mistake
Again, you're saying a driver can put a car higher than it should be. They can't. The car can either do the lap time or it can't. George did a sensational job, no one is denying it, but the time he did is what the car is capable of, no more.
Media enjoy sensationalistic terms to get some clicks and views, but some others around here also enjoy sensationalism and statements like "none can outdrive his car because physics are physics". Yes, but drivers are drivers, not robots, so results can change drastically depending on drivers perfomance, wich means that cars can also qualify higher or lower than it should really be if the driver got from it more than his rivals, obviously he can´t get more than 100%, but he can certainly get more than his rivals
It's the "higher than it should do" that annoys me. If the driver does a lap time, then it's because the car is capable of that time. All a driver can do is perform better than those in the similar cars (so just his team mate, in F1).
When Senna qualified in Monaco 1.4s faster than Prost in 1988, that was just because Prost wasn't able to get the lap time out of the car. The car was capable of doing it or Senna wouldn't have got the time he got. Likewise Hamilton being 1.5s faster than Bottas in qualifying for the 2020 Styrian Grand Prix. Hamilton just got more out of the car than Bottas did. The car was capable of that time (and perhaps even quicker).
You don't get what I mean....
I'm not saying they can get a faster time than possible, that's not possible
I'm saying if car A is fastest, and car B second, 2 tenths behind, if driver on car A do a good lap but not perfect, let's say 2.2 tenths from the car potential, if driver on car B do an almost perfect lap, he'll get the pole, even if his car is not the fastest.
He didn't do magic, the car didn't do a faster than possible lap, but the driver managed to put it higher than it should really be.
Problem is if you just say driver A messed it up, I find it extremely arrogant and irrespectful with driver A, he does not deserve the bashing , but driver B deserve huge praising, so I prefer saying driver B put his car higher than it should really be