Yeah okay, you could be right there.search wrote: ↑22 Mar 2025, 13:35Q: Are you surprised about the performance of Racing Bulls?SirBastianVettel wrote: ↑22 Mar 2025, 13:15Sadly this video is not available for the geographically challenged. What did Max say?
V: I mean, they are doing very well. They are very close to me. Maybe that also says something... but yeah. I don't know.
So honestly no idea if this is directed at Lawson at all. Could also be about the car.
Its 100% about the car.the EDGE wrote: ↑22 Mar 2025, 13:53Yeah okay, you could be right there.search wrote: ↑22 Mar 2025, 13:35Q: Are you surprised about the performance of Racing Bulls?SirBastianVettel wrote: ↑22 Mar 2025, 13:15
Sadly this video is not available for the geographically challenged. What did Max say?
V: I mean, they are doing very well. They are very close to me. Maybe that also says something... but yeah. I don't know.
So honestly no idea if this is directed at Lawson at all. Could also be about the car.
But it’s worth noting he looks very sheepish when he says it, I think if it was a dig at the car he might have been a bit more direct
This is how you really throw a wrench into the mix.
Thats one of MV character attributes not often projected.f1isgood wrote: ↑22 Mar 2025, 13:51Looking at Sprint times, do the tires simply fall off once Piastri passes Max or is it simply the case that Max doesn't care anymore as gap between him and George is big enough when Piastri gets by? That drop off is like 2 seconds almost immediately. I am still not convinced the degradation is worse than Mercedes for instance but we will see.
Understeer? That's the last thing it needs. It's already understeering like a pig for Lawson in most corners. And understeer kills the front tyres which is already the main limitation in China.venkyhere wrote: ↑22 Mar 2025, 15:13My gut feel says Redbull should break parc ferme' and massively change the setup on the 2nd RB21 to make it 'slower' by inducing some understeer into the car, that will make it more 'tame'. But it requires the team to step out of their tunnel vision , and understand the needs of their 2nd driver. If they do it, Lawson will be able to redeem himself in the race (by finishing b/w P11 and P14) and then gain enough confidence to push the car to limits in Suzuka and drive it 'properly'. I want to see Lawson finish ahead of the VCARBs in Suzuka. I am partial like that, want to back the underdog. It will be a big story and a juicy episode for DTS.
That is not correct. It's all about driving skills and RB21 is too hard for untalented.organic wrote:Max says he feels comfortable in the car and can push when he needs to and not make mistakes. So it has to be a significant step in terms of ease to drive over last year. Perhaps Lawson is just suffering under the pressure.
ringo wrote: ↑22 Mar 2025, 15:18I think RB21 is fundamentally Max's DNA down to the monocoque. Setup to be slower may not fix Liam's issues.
Maybe's he's gonna need his own steering rack, power steering, pedals, clutch, PU maps, front wing. Yes that drastic! Cannot underestimate how much of the team's engineering path has been lead by Max since 2018.
The car would be a RB21L. And the team just doesnt have the resources for that.
I think cars are just very close over one lap. Even VCARB is only 4 tenths behind McLaren. This is not surprising in these regulations where even Haas was just very fast over a lap. The top teams also have better race pace for which I am yet to see any concrete evidence VCARB is close to Red Bull tbh. Even the sprint today I think it's not the actual pace of Red Bull. Max eased off quite a bit after Piastri passed him.