beelsebob wrote:Yes it is – that's my point... We've had some races, now we can be smart about predicting what might happen at future ones.
A look at history shows us nothing frankly. Absolutely zero.
You can say RBR Mclaren Renault and Ferrari
might be fighting for a win but more specific then that is pure guess work.
beelsebob wrote:Yes it has – when has it gone up and down, in what conditions has it worked? Do these map onto the conditions we'll see at Spa, what does that say about how fast the team will be there?
Again, you have no idea what updates the teams will bring.
Teams have been strong and weak in totally different temps, totally different wear and degradation on cars throughout the races etc.
beelsebob wrote:Agreed, McLaren's wet pace is a mystery, we can't predict that, that doesn't mean we can't predict anything.
Ok Nostradamus, predict the winner. What car will be quickest in SPA.
I garantuee you it will be one big guess. What you can say is this and this and this team will
probably be competitive.
But it´s just guess work again.
beelsebob wrote:You certainly can get *some* information out of it. Clearly it won't predict an exact result, that doesn't mean you can't make general predictions like "McLaren should be quick here", "Ferrari should do okay here", or "Lotus won't run well here unless their new upgrade is sensational".
It´s just guesses though. You can´t really predict anything, just guess and say well Mclaren has ran good in this condition.
But then you have a contradiction from another race saying this condition is not good for Mclaren.
It´s all guesses. Some will guess right but nobody will know for sure who has the quickest car in SPA.
You have to take into consideration updates as well which can make you go from mid-field to winning races.