Jackie Stewart F1 legends question (aka is F1 too safe)

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
SeijaKessen
4
Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:34
Location: USA

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

I do not believe in slowing tracks down in knee-jerk methods.

What I suggested would still have left risk involved if any driver went off in that corner.

Better than the chicane that got put in place where all risk/reward associated with the corner is gone.

Nando
Nando
2
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 02:30

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

SeijaKessen wrote:He's driving a midfield car fielded by a team that doesn't know what they are doing.

Not sure why you would expect more.
So you don´t deny the car is hard to handle?

I rest my case.
"Il Phenomeno" - The one they fear the most!

"2% of the world's population own 50% of the world's wealth."

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

SeijaKessen wrote:I do not believe in slowing tracks down in knee-jerk methods.
And how many tracks are slowed down? Apart from the temporary chicanes being installed (and later remover) at places like Montreal and Monza most of the track mods were done in attempt to provide more overtaking opportunities.
SeijaKessen wrote:What I suggested would still have left risk involved if any driver went off in that corner.

Better than the chicane that got put in place where all risk/reward associated with the corner is gone.
As I said the chicane was done because there was no way to make a proper run-off.

User avatar
SeijaKessen
4
Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:34
Location: USA

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

Nando wrote:
SeijaKessen wrote:He's driving a midfield car fielded by a team that doesn't know what they are doing.

Not sure why you would expect more.
So you don´t deny the car is hard to handle?

I rest my case.
Hard to handle?

A car can be easy to handle, but it may not have the performance relative to everyone else.

I'd quit now if I were you.

User avatar
SeijaKessen
4
Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:34
Location: USA

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

timbo wrote:
SeijaKessen wrote:I do not believe in slowing tracks down in knee-jerk methods.
And how many tracks are slowed down? Apart from the temporary chicanes being installed (and later remover) at places like Montreal and Monza most of the track mods were done in attempt to provide more overtaking opportunities.
SeijaKessen wrote:What I suggested would still have left risk involved if any driver went off in that corner.

Better than the chicane that got put in place where all risk/reward associated with the corner is gone.
As I said the chicane was done because there was no way to make a proper run-off.
Proper run-off...lol...Spa looks great with the parking lots. While Bernie is bending them over, maybe they can just paint white lines in all those spots and charge for parking. It might help cover some costs!

Check out the Tilkedromes.

90 degree turns everywhere!

No more real sweeping high speed corners to be found!

How's the Osterreichring and the Bosch Kurve doing?

What about the old Hockenheimring with no chicane heading into the Ostkurve...or even the old Hockenheimring altogether?

Remember when the Curva Grande at Monza used actually be grande?

Truthfully, this discussion is pointless now.

You have your own beliefs on this subject, just as I have mine. Neither one of us will budge and I accept it. Although I suppose Nando still can't right buddy?

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

SeijaKessen wrote: Check out the Tilkedromes.

90 degree turns everywhere!

No more real sweeping high speed corners to be found!
And how about turn 8 in Turkey?
SeijaKessen wrote: You have your own beliefs on this subject, just as I have mine.
I have pretty low tolerance when the deal is about safety. Thinking we're too safe is dangerous. It leads to complacency.
Before Senna and Ratzenberger died there were 8 years without a fatality in F1 and 12 years without deaths during GP weekend. And at those days there were comments about "incredible safety" of "modern F1 cars". More so, the accidents of Berger, Donnelly etc were not treated as alarms, but were heralded as a demonstration of safety.
There are things to be learned from that.

User avatar
SeijaKessen
4
Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:34
Location: USA

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

timbo wrote:
SeijaKessen wrote: Check out the Tilkedromes.

90 degree turns everywhere!

No more real sweeping high speed corners to be found!
And how about turn 8 in Turkey?
SeijaKessen wrote: You have your own beliefs on this subject, just as I have mine.
I have pretty low tolerance when the deal is about safety. Thinking we're too safe is dangerous. It leads to complacency.
Before Senna and Ratzenberger died there were 8 years without a fatality in F1 and 12 years without deaths during GP weekend. And at those days there were comments about "incredible safety" of "modern F1 cars". More so, the accidents of Berger, Donnelly etc were not treated as alarms, but were heralded as a demonstration of safety.
There are things to be learned from that.
Everyone has a choice.

I don't subscribe to the whole notion of protecting people from themselves.

Racing is not essential to living.

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

In all honesty, I don't get this "safety-theme" in racing, mountaineers and bull-fighters die once in a while, don't they?
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
SeijaKessen
4
Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:34
Location: USA

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

xpensive wrote:In all honesty, I don't get this "safety-theme" in racing, mountaineers and bull-fighters die once in a while, don't they?
NFL players here in the US face shortened lifespans due to the physicals dangers in American football.

People continue to want to play professionally even in spite of all of the evidence coming out that constantly taking high impact blows tends to be a bad thing.

Boxers run the risk of health issues later in life because amazingly, taking punches to the head has turned out to be bad for one's health!

People know this, and they choose to do it anyway.

Big deal.

I loved Senna, and I do wish he was still alive, as I do with countless others.

It would have been nice to see a round table in the 21st century with Jimmy Clark, Ayrton Senna, Bruce McLaren, Jo Siffert, Jochen Rindt, Ronnie Peterson, Gilles Villeneuve, and others all sitting at it in discussion. However, what people forget is that one of the reasons that some of the drivers are so legendary now is because they died behind the wheel of a car. That adds to the allure these men all have now. The one thing I always will enjoy about Senna's death, is in knowing as he went into the Tamburello, unlike any other driver, he was in first place, and was unbeaten by the SOB behind him.

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

Out of the blue this reminded me, the business we have chosen, right strad?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PteyEDStTOE
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

There were 14 fatalies out of 220+ drivers competing during '60s.
220?? Show me that list. There were for the most part, less than 25 guys that were qualified to drive and that includes ones you aint never heard of.
Nando:
Just drop it...all you want to do is argue...troll is the word I believe.
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss

User avatar
SeijaKessen
4
Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:34
Location: USA

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

xpensive wrote:Out of the blue this reminded me, the business we have chosen, right strad?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PteyEDStTOE
I should upvote this.

After all, upvoting is all opinion anyway eh?

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

Completely taken out of context of course, but isn't it, for most people involved in any walk of life?
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

strad wrote:
There were 14 fatalies out of 220+ drivers competing during '60s.
220?? Show me that list. There were for the most part, less than 25 guys that were qualified to drive and that includes ones you aint never heard of.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Fo ... ne_drivers

Nando
Nando
2
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 02:30

Re: Jackie Stewart F1 legends question

Post

SeijaKessen wrote:I don't subscribe to the whole notion of protecting people from themselves.
Racing is not essential to living.
Image
"Il Phenomeno" - The one they fear the most!

"2% of the world's population own 50% of the world's wealth."