2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

justmoi wrote:
godlameroso wrote:If you only knew who I work with :) I got access to some pretty cool weather stuff. Mostly you do to if you know where to look.

http://weather.cod.edu/index.php This is a good site for U.S. weather.

https://www.windytv.com/ This one is ok, has nice graphics and you can cycle between GFS and ECMWF

https://www.wunderground.com/ Probably the site with more or less the most accurate forecasts because they use data aggregates from air ports, weather stations, weather ballons, radar, satellite, and some other stuff I can't remember. Plus I'm pretty proud of the fact they used some of my code indirectly :)
Lol am i mistaken or does even your wunderground website show that there is actually rain predicted for saturday and sunday? Like GPRA said
I said it was going to rain, look at the first page of this whole thread :D

I'm only a messenger.

http://www.goes.noaa.gov/

More stuff if you like getting your nerd on.
Saishū kōnā

justmoi
justmoi
1
Joined: 02 Mar 2016, 03:35

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

godlameroso wrote:
justmoi wrote:
godlameroso wrote:If you only knew who I work with :) I got access to some pretty cool weather stuff. Mostly you do to if you know where to look.

http://weather.cod.edu/index.php This is a good site for U.S. weather.

https://www.windytv.com/ This one is ok, has nice graphics and you can cycle between GFS and ECMWF

https://www.wunderground.com/ Probably the site with more or less the most accurate forecasts because they use data aggregates from air ports, weather stations, weather ballons, radar, satellite, and some other stuff I can't remember. Plus I'm pretty proud of the fact they used some of my code indirectly :)
Lol am i mistaken or does even your wunderground website show that there is actually rain predicted for saturday and sunday? Like GPRA said
I said it was going to rain, look at the first page of this whole thread :D

I'm only a messenger.

http://www.goes.noaa.gov/

More stuff if you like getting your nerd on.
Cool

User avatar
iotar__
7
Joined: 28 Sep 2012, 12:31

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

Whiting will attend PC with (dramatic music) Verstappen and Vettel. Another clarification Charlie? Will he clarify track limits as his friends at RB requested? No, backslapping session and all is good at Todt's emporium of doing evil stuff quietly and behind the scenes.

Why didn't he go to press conference with:
- Hulkenberg - Sainz (Sing)
- Massa - Alonso (USA)
- Sainz - Alonso (Mex)
- Verstappen - Raikkonen x2 and so on.

They all talked. Equal and more equal is the answer.

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

was just posted on autosport forums:
Some weather forecasts

Rodolfo Alves ‏@Rodolfoar07
#F1 #BRAZILGP WEATHER UPDATE - FRIDAY: Partly Cloudy with chance (30-40%) of Isolated T-Storms for FP2. Air Temp 27-29ºC
SATURDAY: Cloudy/Mostly Cloudy with chance of light rain/drizzle at times. Cooler. Air Temp 19-21ºC
SUNDAY: Mostly Cloudy Skies with chance (40-45%) of some Rain Showers for Race Window. Air Temp 21-23ºC

Ian Fergusson ‏@fergieweather
@mraishbrook trend lately increases chance of patchy phases of rain (this looking fairly light) at times on both Sat and Sun at Interlagos.

So no worries about SC starts. That wont happen.
sounds like a dry race to me 8)
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

User avatar
Godius
186
Joined: 02 Mar 2013, 12:49
Location: NL

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

I think that Whiting will announce that starting from next year, or maybe from Brazil onwards, he will enforce every rule from the start of the race and not from lap 2 until the end of the race (current rules).

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

Godius wrote:I think that Whiting will announce that starting from next year, or maybe from Brazil onwards, he will enforce every rule from the start of the race and not from lap 2 until the end of the race (current rules).
Why would he?

Because RB drivers and Team is crying like B*tches?
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

User avatar
Godius
186
Joined: 02 Mar 2013, 12:49
Location: NL

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

FrukostScones wrote:
Godius wrote:I think that Whiting will announce that starting from next year, or maybe from Brazil onwards, he will enforce every rule from the start of the race and not from lap 2 until the end of the race (current rules).
Why would he?

Because RB drivers and Team is crying like B*tches?
Because any reasonable impression of partiality is deadly towards the stewards, hence why Whiting feels that it is necessary to explain himself to the press.

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

Godius wrote:
FrukostScones wrote:
Godius wrote:I think that Whiting will announce that starting from next year, or maybe from Brazil onwards, he will enforce every rule from the start of the race and not from lap 2 until the end of the race (current rules).
Why would he?

Because RB drivers and Team is crying like B*tches?
Because any reasonable impression of partiality is deadly towards the stewards, hence why Whiting feels that it is necessary to explain himself to the press.
it is only for entertainment value (that is very limited imo)
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

User avatar
WaikeCU
14
Joined: 14 May 2014, 00:03

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

Shame Interlagos isn't the last race of the season anymore. It would be nice to wave Massa off when he's retiring. Last race of his career in F1, last race of the season and it's in Brazil. It would have been perfect. I think I'm getting used to some special moments in the past.

- Special livery of the Red Bull of Coulthard in his last race
- Schumacher's lap towards the grid on his last race of his career
- Webber driving around after the race without his helmet

ChrisDanger
ChrisDanger
26
Joined: 30 Mar 2011, 09:59

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

Perhaps Hamilton's antics a few races ago has spurred a slight change of focus in the press conference, so we can now have an open and transparent discussion of the issues instead of getting 2nd or 3rd hand information of alleged conversations, or reading opinions of how the FIA are to blame for favouritism or some other nonsense.

User avatar
pob
12
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 05:00

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

Any move towards greater transparency is a good thing even though the drivers will probably have been prepped so that they'll be singing from the same song sheet as Charlie.

User avatar
iotar__
7
Joined: 28 Sep 2012, 12:31

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

pob wrote:Any move towards greater transparency is a good thing even though the drivers will probably have been prepped so that they'll be singing from the same song sheet as Charlie.
- Rehearsed public performance for one specific case is hardly transparency.
- Explanations worthless. Hamilton didn't 'escape' anything because like Verstappen (Spa, Hun) he wasn't even investigated. The reason is the same, it's easier to avoid reality that way.

cooken
cooken
11
Joined: 02 Apr 2013, 01:57

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

Did you miss the press conference where Charlie clearly stated that Lewis backed off as confirmed by his telemetry? Of course one must then believe him...

However, you have to be pretty daft to think the stewards don't look at every incident and make some kind of informal judgement on it. Whether there is an "investigation" notice that flashes up on your TV screen or appears in some form of official document is kind of irrelevant isn't it?

Getting fairly excited about this race, given the mixed forecasts. How refreshing would it be to see an RB or Ferrari on pole? After their respective years of dominance I never thought I'd feel that way but here we are. An actual race for top step on the podium would be a treat.

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

cooken wrote:Did you miss the press conference where Charlie clearly stated that Lewis backed off as confirmed by his telemetry? Of course one must then believe him...
It's best to completely ignore the existence of the person you are responding to, as it will be better for your sanity in the long run.
201 105 104 9 9 7

User avatar
iotar__
7
Joined: 28 Sep 2012, 12:31

Re: 2016 Grand Prix of Brazil - Interlagos, 11-13 November

Post

cooken wrote:Did you miss the press conference where Charlie clearly stated that Lewis backed off as confirmed by his telemetry? Of course one must then believe him...

However, you have to be pretty daft to think the stewards don't look at every incident and make some kind of informal judgement on it. Whether there is an "investigation" notice that flashes up on your TV screen or appears in some form of official document is kind of irrelevant isn't it?

Getting fairly excited about this race, given the mixed forecasts. How refreshing would it be to see an RB or Ferrari on pole? After their respective years of dominance I never thought I'd feel that way but here we are. An actual race for top step on the podium would be a treat.
Backed off meaning what? How does this nonsense pseudo excuse change anything? This backing off doesn't change the fundamentals of the event. He out-braked himself as confirmed by telemetry and everyone's eyes (advantage compared to drivers braking earlier and making the corner) and drove straight as confirmed by GPS and eyes, didn't even try making the corner (as confirmed by telemetry again ;-)) which resulted in saving tyres and thus gaining another advantage. The part when he can't make the corner is his fault but without the price - the end.

Whiting's clarifcation is the usual mockery: we are always right. Does anyone expects them to admit to bias? They either say they are right (despite dozens examples of contradictory decisions), or it's a problem with unclear rules (no, it's you), or the best part: it's the track that is to blame. We change the track = problems will disappear.