50% Less Downforce in 2009

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
Conceptual
Conceptual
0
Joined: 15 Nov 2007, 03:33

Re: 50% Less Downforce in 2009

Post

checkered wrote:The chance to have

tangible, first-hand literature about "Nouveau Tech" materialised rather quickly in light of the earlier descriptions of the overall nature of access to such information. These sorts of opportunities, I gather, are hastened by the potency of contemporary media. Your personal investment in this matter is not lost on me, Conceptual.

My answer to your offer however, is "no". That is final.

The plainness of the above statement is only so that we can spare each other from pursuing this matter any further. It is also to spare the board of a further public "OT" exchange in an interesting thread, a consideration of which I'm bemused to lose track of on my own accord, to say the very least.

I'm sure we'll continue to discern each others' continued contribution on matters pertaining to Formula One on F1T.
Fair enough. If you change your mind, PM me, and I will do what I can to enlighten you to the truths behind Objective Reality and the Psychuous Mind.

Chris

rjsa
rjsa
51
Joined: 02 Mar 2007, 03:01

Re: 50% Less Downforce in 2009

Post

About downforce and racing, a sad statment. translation by AFCA at AtlasF1:
Q: Could it also be improve the stability of the car when it's in the slipstream of another ?
Tombazis: ''I don't think so. In the windtunnel we don't do such tests and if you want to find out about similar effects, you learn about them on track.''
F1 is processional because cars are designed so.