xpensive wrote:I hear that reason for the delay of making the resource-cap official, is for the FOTA-teams to agree on methods and limitations of cheating the system. Points of debate;
- How many engineers can you have working from home, paid directly from a sponsor's account or a car-dealership?
- How may "trainees" can you have working in the shop "pro-bono"?
- What's the reasonable limit on subsidized components from related companies?
- Does the 40-head limit on race-crew involve "guests", or only those staying at the same hotel or have a pit-pass?
There might be others as well.
You are re-hashing old problems -- BUT they and MANY more are very important to resolve. Realistically, most of us (IMHO) would agree that totally unlimited spending is a means for F1 to slowly commit suicide. But philosophically, a budget cap (especially one which seems to be a fraction of previous spending) just does not fit with what ought to be the pinnacle of motor sport. Take a group of aggressive, competitive, creative individuals and tell them to go all out to beat similar groups. Then tell them they have a very limited budget. You might get brilliant creativity. Or very creative cheating. Most likely both. (I'm for reduced spending. I just can't get my mind around a way that will work.)
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill