2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
epo
epo
-6
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 19:57

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

Chandhok got it spot on, it was always Leclerc intention as he had no chance :

"Here’s my view... Back in the day, the driver on the outside would have to back out and realise when he’s been beaten. Now, they can keep going, knowing that they can use the asphalt run off and then hope that the argument about “being squeezed off” wins in the stewards room...."

https://twitter.com/karunchandhok/statu ... Flive-blog
Last edited by epo on 30 Jun 2019, 21:10, edited 3 times in total.

dtro
dtro
3
Joined: 06 Feb 2019, 19:39

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

Shrieker wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 20:54
Now that Max's win is going to stand, I wonder what Alonso is up to these days :lol:
First Honda win in F1 since 1992? Honda be thinking "Alonso who?"

roon
roon
412
Joined: 17 Dec 2016, 19:04

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

I open my morning paper to find that a RB-Honda has won a GP. Very impressive! Congrats to both halves of that arrangement.

f1316
f1316
82
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

dtro wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 21:10
Shrieker wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 20:54
Now that Max's win is going to stand, I wonder what Alonso is up to these days :lol:
First Honda win in F1 since 1992? Honda be thinking "Alonso who?"
2006 with Button in Hungary to be fair :)

User avatar
Cuky
65
Joined: 07 Dec 2011, 19:41
Location: Rab, Croatia

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

epo wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 21:10
Chandhok got it spot on, it was always Leclerc intention as he had no chance :

"Here’s my view... Back in the day, the driver on the outside would have to back out and realise when he’s been beaten. Now, they can keep going, knowing that they can use the asphalt run off and then hope that the argument about “being squeezed off” wins in the stewards room...."

https://twitter.com/karunchandhok/statu ... Flive-blog
And when you're Hamilton or Verstappen your argument usually wins. See Austria 2016 and Germany 2016

User avatar
Steven
Owner
Joined: 19 Aug 2002, 18:32
Location: Belgium

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

epo wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 21:10
Chandhok got it spot on, it was always Leclerc intention as he had no chance :

"Here’s my view... Back in the day, the driver on the outside would have to back out and realise when he’s been beaten. Now, they can keep going, knowing that they can use the asphalt run off and then hope that the argument about “being squeezed off” wins in the stewards room...."

https://twitter.com/karunchandhok/statu ... Flive-blog
Exactly. It used to be very normal for the inside driver to just go as deep as possible, to avoid the outside car to attempt to turn in.
The outside car usually then opts to cut in early, and try to get a better drive out of the corner to recover from the dive bomb.

In any case, the outside of the corner is always the vulnerable position, hence I don't understand why Leclerc didn't even attempt to hold the inside line for braking, especially after he was almost nailed in the previous two laps as well.

Overall, this was a good race, with Verstappen's botched start a blessing for the remaining 71 laps :)

f1316
f1316
82
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

I think it’s right that this kind of thing is not punished - when viewed in isolation, I think it’s bad for racing if something like this is punished - so kinda relieved, even as a Ferrari fan, that there’s no punishment here. Don’t want to win that way.

But the wider context of how penalties are or are not given is totally confusing - it’s never clear if we have a ‘let them race’ mentality, with context etc. playing a part, or if it’s a strict ‘this is the rule as defined and we enforce accordingly’ view. I much prefer the former but somehow someone’s got to make sense of how it all works - I remember many years ago we had a steward who served at every race to try and promote consistency...maybe that would help?

Two other observations:
- I don’t understand why it was necessary for Max to open up the steering as he did - he had the inside line and the run out anyway; sometimes I think he likes the bumper cars aspect, which is probably also a bit troubling

- don’t understand why Charles didn’t cover the inside line; obvious Max would come up the inside and, although he made it work the previous lap, that was not a sustainable defence

sosic2121
sosic2121
13
Joined: 08 Jun 2016, 12:14

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

turbof1 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 20:57


EDIT: looking at it myself, Rosberg did not bother to turn in and just rammed into Hamilton.
And what if show you a picture of Nico's steering wheel pointing to the right just before the contact.
And then I show you a picture of Lewis steering wheel on full lock right.
And then bird view picture showing there is 1 meter of track between Hamilton and white line in the moment of contact.

Would you still believed Rosberg rammed into Hamilton?

LM10
LM10
121
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 00:07

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

Steven wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 21:23
epo wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 21:10
Chandhok got it spot on, it was always Leclerc intention as he had no chance :

"Here’s my view... Back in the day, the driver on the outside would have to back out and realise when he’s been beaten. Now, they can keep going, knowing that they can use the asphalt run off and then hope that the argument about “being squeezed off” wins in the stewards room...."

https://twitter.com/karunchandhok/statu ... Flive-blog
Exactly. It used to be very normal for the inside driver to just go as deep as possible, to avoid the outside car to attempt to turn in.
The outside car usually then opts to cut in early, and try to get a better drive out of the corner to recover from the dive bomb.

In any case, the outside of the corner is always the vulnerable position, hence I don't understand why Leclerc didn't even attempt to hold the inside line for braking, especially after he was almost nailed in the previous two laps as well.

Overall, this was a good race, with Verstappen's botched start a blessing for the remaining 71 laps :)
This is the exact same thing which Rosberg did in this example:

https://mobile.twitter.com/_TheF1Gamer/ ... 7596320771

Rosberg got a penalty for this.

User avatar
jjn9128
778
Joined: 02 May 2017, 23:53

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

turbof1 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 20:57
LM10 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 20:55
So what was the decisive difference between the situation of Max and Rosberg at the same spot in 2016 when Rosberg got a 5 seconds penalty and the today’s one?
I don't personally have formed an opinion about that, but for reference here is the 2016 incident:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixmGVL4dedI

2019 incident:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABKY6nbKIL4

EDIT: looking at it myself, Rosberg did not bother to turn in and just rammed into Hamilton. Verstappen did actually turned in and just had very minor contact with Leclerc. I'm still not sure myself if Verstappen deserved a penalty or not, but in Rosberg's case it was much more severe.
Totally different - in 2016 Hamilton was already ahead on the brakes on entry - not that I thought that was a penalty at the time as it was similar to other moves through '14/'15 and '16. That's the problem with trying to write a rule for similar cases because there are so many minute variations it's never a clear and direct comparison.

IMO this sort of move is the anathema of racing. To drive up the inside and push the other guy off (he did open the steering) on the exit to stop them coming back. What we got the lap (or 2 maybe highlights missed a lap) was racing. 1 guy overtook then the other guy came back on the gas and the fight carried on. That's racing. That's the wheel-to-wheel action we so desperately need more of.

I don't want penalties deciding races, but if we're rigidly enforcing rules as in Canada then this was a case of crowding another car off the circuit.
#aerogandalf
"There is one big friend. It is downforce. And once you have this it’s a big mate and it’s helping a lot." Robert Kubica

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

sosic2121 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 21:28
turbof1 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 20:57


EDIT: looking at it myself, Rosberg did not bother to turn in and just rammed into Hamilton.
And what if show you a picture of Nico's steering wheel pointing to the right just before the contact.
And then I show you a picture of Lewis steering wheel on full lock right.
And then bird view picture showing there is 1 meter of track between Hamilton and white line in the moment of contact.

Would you still believed Rosberg rammed into Hamilton?
I think you completely missed the point. what Nico did was basically try and prevent Lewis making the turn at all.

if you can't tell the difference between that incident, and the one today, you are going to be unhappy with most stewards decisions.
201 105 104 9 9 7

dtro
dtro
3
Joined: 06 Feb 2019, 19:39

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

f1316 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 21:13
dtro wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 21:10
Shrieker wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 20:54
Now that Max's win is going to stand, I wonder what Alonso is up to these days :lol:
First Honda win in F1 since 1992? Honda be thinking "Alonso who?"
2006 with Button in Hungary to be fair :)
I stand corrected! :) Still a thirteen year winless streak ended!

sosic2121
sosic2121
13
Joined: 08 Jun 2016, 12:14

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

dans79 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 21:33
sosic2121 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 21:28
turbof1 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 20:57


EDIT: looking at it myself, Rosberg did not bother to turn in and just rammed into Hamilton.
And what if show you a picture of Nico's steering wheel pointing to the right just before the contact.
And then I show you a picture of Lewis steering wheel on full lock right.
And then bird view picture showing there is 1 meter of track between Hamilton and white line in the moment of contact.

Would you still believed Rosberg rammed into Hamilton?
I think you completely missed the point. what Nico did was basically try and prevent Lewis making the turn at all.

if you can't tell the difference between that incident, and the one today, you are going to be unhappy with most stewards decisions.
o i can see difference between guy pushing other guy toward the white line and over the white line.

jz11
jz11
19
Joined: 14 Sep 2010, 21:32

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

it used to be simple - if there is a car beside you, you have to leave cars width of space till the while line, you can't just ignore that someone is next to you and push the other one off the track, inside, outside, entry, apex, exit, doesn't matter, the other guy is beside you, you account for that

this just opened up a can of worms... next thing they will do is do this on the straight line, just wait...

IMHO the decision was this way just because they already had one controversy where stewards decided race outcome, and they simply didn't want another one, but consistency wise - this just doesn't follow the path they were on

zac510
zac510
22
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 12:58

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

Leclerc should have just drive wide out onto the tarmac, around the yellow sausage kerb and then flat out back onto the circuit, just like Zhou in the F2 Sprint and Raikkonen did in 2018.