A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
I partly agree with the comment: since it's mandatory the max width (28mm), wouldn't the benefit be only at a surface level, with a bit wider holes? You can't add a 5th-6th line of holes, this additional line wouldn't find space in the 28mm width
The article cites increased surface as an advantage. The increase in surface would appear to be rather minimal and one would think that most cooling is via flow through the holes anyways, and that exchange surface is being diminished by the scalloped edge.
What other advantages could this shape bring?
Rivals, not enemies. (Now paraphrased from A. Newey).
hollus wrote:The article cites increased surface as an advantage. The increase in surface would appear to be rather minimal and one would think that most cooling is via flow through the holes anyways, and that exchange surface is being diminished by the scalloped edge.
What other advantages could this shape bring?
Would it be this surface area that's important? Dimensions are a bit rough, but maybe 5-10% extra cooling for the Merc? (If cooling is proportional to surface area.)
hollus wrote:The article cites increased surface as an advantage. The increase in surface would appear to be rather minimal and one would think that most cooling is via flow through the holes anyways, and that exchange surface is being diminished by the scalloped edge.
What other advantages could this shape bring?
Would it be this surface area that's important? Dimensions are a bit rough, but maybe 5-10% extra cooling for the Merc? (If cooling is proportional to surface area.)
Maybe it just helps the air flow away from the edge when the disc runs through the caliper. It's probably a minor improvement but any improvement is a good thing.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.
isn't it strange how merc are quite often reporting a technical problem in one of their cars, yet they always seem to get repaired by putting on another setting, with little to no performance loss?
strange, given when any other team has a technical problem, they start to rapidly lose their pace and most of the time they can't fix it at all without changing parts.
it's very strange to me.
it's also strange how they're always faster than others. in practice, the difference can even be very small, but come quali and they're mostly atleast a second ahead of any team.
and yet the car doesn't have any visible tricks to it, like an f-duct or whatever we've had in the past. in fact, it looks simple to me. the way other teams are reporting their HP gains on new engines, merc should be around 1200bhp by now! that's about 450bhp above of what the regulations were supposed to be designed for, an engine of around 750bhp. fuel flow limits and all that.
i think merc have found that loophole or whatever. and f1 is dirty. the term "motorsport" doesn't apply to f1.
i have dyslexia and english is not my native language. please be gentle.
hollus wrote:The article cites increased surface as an advantage. The increase in surface would appear to be rather minimal and one would think that most cooling is via flow through the holes anyways, and that exchange surface is being diminished by the scalloped edge.
What other advantages could this shape bring?
Would it be this surface area that's important? Dimensions are a bit rough, but maybe 5-10% extra cooling for the Merc? (If cooling is proportional to surface area.)
We get that!
But that 5 to 10% increase is good for the exit only, for the hole we actually see. The whole duct beneath has the same width as before, the 7.03 mm*2