T-C you might find Kevin Cameron's take on 'big-bang' to be of interest..Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑21 Apr 2017, 14:31big bang is a silly myth if people see BB as some magic beans boosting traction in car or bike GPs
because torque variations at the crankshaft...
...people should remember all previous 2 strokes 4s had for practicality cylinder pairs firing simultaneously and kept them for 4 decades
eg Suzuki square 4s 60s-90s and Yam 60s & 80s-90s 'square Vs' & 70s inlines - nobody called them BB
and the (4 stroke) Honda NR500 had a 0 deg '2 pin' crank - but nobody called that BB
(FW17 you can check the firing intervals of all these Honda 0 deg cranks ie whether 270/450 intervals or 90/630 intervals)...
http://www.cycleworld.com/strange-tire- ... n-insights
Irregular firing impulses & crank angle configurations with disruptive inertial torque impulses can have unforeseen consequences in NVH,
& via 'shock loading' & 'chatter', cause subsequent fatigue failures, inc' for transmission & accessories..
..which - are a potential-probable cause for the issues McLaren-Honda currently contends with..
A case in point being..
..when R-R built a 'Chinese' copy of the Napier Sabre H-24 aero-engine, they
made some crucial changes, such as having the superimposed twin 180`V12-type crankshafts
run in opposite rotation, linked via a simple spur-type gear.. & with paired cylinders firing together..
..which caused repeated failures of the magneto shaft drive, due to the torsional harmonics..
The Sabre ran its similar crankshaft layout but rotating in the same direction, & phased 180`apart,
so no two cylinders fired together, & they were geared together via a more sophisticated compound balanced unit.. -
..& so avoided the damaging fatigue caused by harmonic 'chatter' - which plagued the ostensibly more simple (& traditionally functional, as used in their V12s ) R-R set-up..