Sorry but you are so sure, you know something that you can share with the world or are you trolling now?
The way It was reported it was miles outside norms so I imagine not.NL_Fer wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 20:04Was it still within the 0,6l/100km directive?Restomaniac wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 02:18They did. The word from Mercedes was that it’s consumption went up ‘very sharply’ for about half a lap before the retirement.RZS10 wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 01:29I'm rather surprised that Mercedes did not see how much oil their car was burning, that must've shown in the telemetry ...
And yea ... it would be just like Indycar where one SC leads into the next ... some of the races are just a bunch of ads interrupted by a string of SCs, but maybe they want to target that audience ... lol
I don't think the directive comes into play if its an actual oil leak.Restomaniac wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 10:54The way It was reported it was miles outside norms so I imagine not.NL_Fer wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 20:04Was it still within the 0,6l/100km directive?Restomaniac wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 02:18
They did. The word from Mercedes was that it’s consumption went up ‘very sharply’ for about half a lap before the retirement.
I wasn’t making that point I was just answering the question.
In that case, both Ferrari's were definitely illegal !! on lap 66, they were clearly seen running way too low ride height!Restomaniac wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 11:17I wasn’t making that point I was just answering the question.SiLo wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 10:59I don't think the directive comes into play if its an actual oil leak.Restomaniac wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 10:54The way It was reported it was miles outside norms so I imagine not.
TBH I agree with you that if we are going to penalise for an internal failure that causes a retirement then it’s time to give up and go home.
NathanOlder wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 12:11In that case, both Ferrari's were definitely illegal !! on lap 66, they were clearly seen running way too low ride height!Restomaniac wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 11:17I wasn’t making that point I was just answering the question.
TBH I agree with you that if we are going to penalise for an internal failure that causes a retirement then it’s time to give up and go home.
Driver of the race IMO.hollus wrote: ↑22 Nov 2019, 21:29Some one asked if Sainz had passed anyone on his way to P3.
Well... yes, yes, yes, 8 times yes! onboard video here:
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/arti ... yJBiO.html
Yeah lovely move.
To me those late dives down the inside are a relative new thing. The old guard like Alonso and even the No 1 driver Hamilton would not attempt that, they would just about always decide to try around the outside once Perez had appeared to cover the inside.TAG wrote: ↑22 Nov 2019, 21:53Driver of the race IMO.hollus wrote: ↑22 Nov 2019, 21:29Some one asked if Sainz had passed anyone on his way to P3.
Well... yes, yes, yes, 8 times yes! onboard video here:
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/arti ... yJBiO.html
Agree, Carlos said after the race for a moment he thought he´d crash with Perez. Pass of the day
NathanOlder wrote: ↑22 Nov 2019, 22:41Yeah lovely move.
The move on Ricciardo was full of risk, great gutsy move. Round the outside of a car with a broken wing on a super fast corner.
LolNathanOlder wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 12:11In that case, both Ferrari's were definitely illegal !! on lap 66, they were clearly seen running way too low ride height!Restomaniac wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 11:17I wasn’t making that point I was just answering the question.
TBH I agree with you that if we are going to penalise for an internal failure that causes a retirement then it’s time to give up and go home.