It's not completely broken. It simply has a fault with the fundamental design. With the sharp angles, it's not providing them with the most reliable data they can get, which explains why their surprised by the lack of performance.type056 wrote:How Ferrari can bring update while they have problem with wind tunnel?
Use another wind tunnel..hehe the Toyota one.type056 wrote:How Ferrari can bring update while they have problem with wind tunnel?
Montezemelo found that there was a tax advantage to claiming the wind tunnel was also a work of art. True story. Take it for whatever it's worth.bot6 wrote:That testing section just seems really small to me. Especially really short. And I hope they have some kind of way to control air temperature in there because otherwise with the fans and the sharp angles the air will heat up very very quickly.
From outside at least it looks like the worse designed wind tunnel I have ever seen. And I have seen a few.
Bridges, dam's, (...), don't have utility?bot6 wrote:And just like any "work of art" that claims itself so, it has absolutely no practical utility.
Worth very little.bhallg2k wrote:Montezemelo found that there was a tax advantage to claiming the wind tunnel was also a work of art. True story. Take it for whatever it's worth.bot6 wrote:That testing section just seems really small to me. Especially really short. And I hope they have some kind of way to control air temperature in there because otherwise with the fans and the sharp angles the air will heat up very very quickly.
From outside at least it looks like the worse designed wind tunnel I have ever seen. And I have seen a few.
Planning permission! That's indeed why the wind tunnel was partially justified as a work of art. I knew something was off when I said tax advantage.Owen.C93 wrote:Easier to get planning permission as well.
LOL, don't make me laugh!Tazio wrote:No, he's walking a dog. A Canary Island Mastiff I believe.roost89 wrote:To aid speed in spotting, there's someone cutting the grass in bottom left
Those stupid FW pillars are what bohters me the most. How can those NOT interfere with front downforce going into a corner, is beyond me. Look at the surface that gets hit by airflow, it's like a bloody sail. The front wing itself is aslo too conservative, they need something new and agressive.HampusA wrote:To bad the speed isn´t there.. It´s such a beautiful car apart from the slightly lardy nosecone and the front wing pillars.
Everything else so so good looking that you would think Pininfarina designed it.
Anybody have some nice pictures? Been kinda empty in these specific car fourms..
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D>SchumacherM wrote:Those stupid FW pillars are what bohters me the most. How can those NOT interfere with front downforce going into a corner, is beyond me. Look at the surface that gets hit by airflow, it's like a bloody sail. The front wing itself is aslo too conservative, they need something new and agressive.HampusA wrote:To bad the speed isn´t there.. It´s such a beautiful car apart from the slightly lardy nosecone and the front wing pillars.
Everything else so so good looking that you would think Pininfarina designed it.
Anybody have some nice pictures? Been kinda empty in these specific car fourms..