He was Rory Byrne's assistant and then took over as Chief Designer when Rory retired.seinfeld wrote:quick question. wasnt Aldo Costa the engine guy for Ferrari a while back? or was he just an engineer? I remember him def being a Ferrari man!
I don't think either of them will get fired for another collision, it would depend on the circumstances for one. Both have them have made plenty overtakes and dueled with each other this year, I'm sure they can do so again!RZS10 wrote:Wolff said they might actually replace the driver who's at fault should they crash again in the next races - is it just me or is Hamilton the one who suffers more from that? I know he has to be careful anyways since he has to finish all the races, but he has to be extra careful in fights with Rosberg now, ofc the same goes for Nico but he has a rather big lead in the standings ... now they are still allowed to drive as they please but have to be extra extra careful, which is almost like "only overtake if it is a no risk maneuver" ~> don't overtake... to me it seems like Rosbergs alleged "proving a point" worked after all
If Hamilton keeps his head down and just drives quickly I think Rosberg will struggle. I think reliability will decide the title; if they both have 100% reliability then Hamilton will win. If Hamilton has another DNF or big points hit then the pressure comes off Rosberg enough for his own speed to show through and take the title. A chess match has less moves and counter-moves!And within F1 - as more information creeps out with the passing of time from conversations between team members - more and more people are coming to the conclusion that his 'mistake' in qualifying in Monaco, when Rosberg went down the escape road and cost Hamilton a chance to beat him to pole, was anything but.
More like: a chess match has less moves when you flip the table!Just_a_fan wrote:Interesting snippet from Coulthard - gossip, admittedly, but bound to have a grain of truth behind it:
If Hamilton keeps his head down and just drives quickly I think Rosberg will struggle. I think reliability will decide the title; if they both have 100% reliability then Hamilton will win. If Hamilton has another DNF or big points hit then the pressure comes off Rosberg enough for his own speed to show through and take the title. A chess match has less moves and counter-moves!And within F1 - as more information creeps out with the passing of time from conversations between team members - more and more people are coming to the conclusion that his 'mistake' in qualifying in Monaco, when Rosberg went down the escape road and cost Hamilton a chance to beat him to pole, was anything but.
He's gotten used to it by nowFoxHound wrote:Interesting also how well Hamilton has taken his misfortunes this year.
Three more wins and Rosberg taking second and the gap is down to 1 point with 3 more races to go.Phil wrote:22 points is still a massive advantage for Rosberg with the 6 races remaining
I feel, Lewis needs a better race engineer than Peter Bonnington and may be the whole of race management team. All of Lewis' results at Merc are of his own smart thinking with very little help from his race engineer. So many times Bonnington comes on radio when Lewis does not need it and seems sleeping when he actually need him. And whenever he gives inputs, most of the times Lewis ignores it. Yesterday's was also a classical case. In last few years, I have seen only Rocky (Vettel's engineer) and Andrea Stella (fernando's engineer) to be precise and very effective race engineers who understand what their driver exactly need.SectorOne wrote:Three more wins and Rosberg taking second and the gap is down to 1 point with 3 more races to go.Phil wrote:22 points is still a massive advantage for Rosberg with the 6 races remaining
Definitely doable.