gruntguru wrote:Compression ignition with burn rate limited by controlled fuel admission (diesel cycle) does not produce greater thermal efficiency, in fact the opposite is true - Otto cycle is more efficient than Diesel for a given CR. The higher CR possible with controlled-rate combustion is one part of the diesel's efficiency advantage. .........
afaik .......
road 'diesel' vehicles always had and still have high-speed CI engines
(not slow speed CI engines, the cycle that was patented by Dr Diesel, this adds its heat at constant pressure)
the high-speed CI so-called 'diesel' adds some heat at constant volume and some at constant pressure, so its cycle is known as the mixed cycle
mixed-cycle CI seems now to have equalled Diesel CI in efficiency (in larger high-speed CI engines and in medium-speed CI anyway) ?
despite its CR not being as high
in slow-speed CI (eg 50 rpm) combustion delay is an insignificant part of the time window and fuel rate gives perfect/full control of combustion rate
to enable higher rpm CI engines a different treatment may be/have been necessary, but appears to allow compensatory benefits ?
though these may be partially forgone by lowering CR again to lower peak cycle temperature and so lower NOx production