Are you sure you didn't model it upside down?rjsa wrote:Boy oh boy my first OF run was frustrating. Plots look like they came from an airplane, not a racing car.
Yes but this obviously affects the results. I think the settings are good enough to use to compare if a design is better than the other. The worst is how the lift balance is predicted. But you can use the fast option to compare lets say ten designs and then use the standard option to check against the best three or something like that.rjsa wrote: Question: The difference between fmvrc_fast, mvrc and mvrc_slow is in the number of interactions or mesh resolution?
I tested your design on my car, but I had not enough time for fine tuning, so I will run with the usual car, but "Le Mans" (= long tail) edition.JJR wrote:I hope you do well Matteo.
I will play a poker game with my car with a lot of changes. I m not sure about cooling performance and about ballance.
Im bored with my old concept so I will bring new. Im in big hurry now to test all changes so i will work on car until last minute
[/quote]CAEdevice wrote:
For the top teams, indipendentley from the design concept, fine tuning makes the difference between df/dr 4.0-4.5 (podium) and 5.0-5.5 (victory).