Team: Pat Fry (TD), Nikolas Tombazis (CD), Stefano Domenicali (MD)
Drivers: Fernando Alonso (5), Felipe Massa (6)
rear end, barge boards, front suspension...Intego wrote:I think they got the sidepods wrong. They should be more elliptic near the floor (as Ringo elaborated in the RB7 thread). MCL and FI copied the bull best.
And where is the aggressive approach on this? It seems like another year of bad copying (beside the nose).
Not two engine exausts, that's illegal. There's no reason why they can't blow the ducts just with hot air from the radiators though. The extra bodywork required for exhaust mounting might make this viable. No way to confirm until testing though!Redragon wrote:Come on guys, let's focus. What do you think about my theory of two exhausts?Redragon wrote:Redragon wrote:http://jorgelizalde.co.uk/ferrrari/Scre ... 30.532.png
In this picture which i made it brighter with photoshop, you can see and I have marked the direction of the exhaust pointing
I think there are two flows, the exhaust pointing down and center. And hot air from the sidepots pointing break ducts
McLaren had the longest car last season, this years car is very similar for McLaren in terms of wheelbase, so is the Ferrari really that much longer? It's a frickin Limo!balalev wrote:
Well, it's not like this is it? This indicates there are crash structure wings separate to the sidepod, which they are not.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Uh the wings are most certainly there, although smaller than he envisioned. Looks like they could create a vortex to feed the rads.
thanksbeelsebob wrote:5.8.2 Engine exhaust systems may incorporate no more than two exits, both of which must be rearward facing tailpipes, through which all exhaust gases must pass.
5.8.3 The last 100mm of any tailpipe must in its entirety :
a) Form a thin‐walled unobstructed right circular cylinder whose internal diameter is no greater than 75mm with its axis at +/‐10° to the car centre line when viewed from above the car and between +10° and +30° (tail‐up) to the reference plane when viewed from the side of the car. The entire circumference of the exit should lie on a single plane normal to the tailpipe axis and be located at the rearmost extremity of the last 100mm of the tailpipe.
b) Be located between 250mm and 600mm above the reference plane.
c) Be located between 200mm and 500mm from the car centre line.
d) Be positioned in order that the entire circumference of the exit of the tailpipe lies between two vertical planes normal to the car centre line and which lie 500mm and 1200mm forward of the rear wheel centre line.
5.8.4 Once the exhaust tailpipes, the bodywork required by Article 3.8.4 and any apertures permitted by Article 3.8.5 have been fully defined there must be no bodywork lying within a right circular truncated cone which :
a) Shares a common axis with that of the last 100mm of the tailpipe.
b) Has a forward diameter equal to that of each exhaust exit.
c) Starts at the exit of the tailpipe and extends rearwards as far as the rear wheel centre line.
d) Has a half‐cone angle of 3° such that the cone has its larger diameter at the rear wheel centre line.
Furthermore, there must be a view from above, the side, or any intermediate angle perpendicular to the car centre line, from which the truncated cone is not obscured by any bodywork lying more than 50mm forward of the rear wheel centre line.
that was drawn from verbal discriptions given to Piolahorse wrote:Well, it's not like this is it? This indicates there are crash structure wings separate to the sidepod, which they are not.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Uh the wings are most certainly there, although smaller than he envisioned. Looks like they could create a vortex to feed the rads.
So I guess he nearly nailed it.
As I thought, scarbs confirmed the cooling is there too:scarlet wrote:Not two engine exausts, that's illegal. There's no reason why they can't blow the ducts just with hot air from the radiators though. The extra bodywork required for exhaust mounting might make this viable. No way to confirm until testing though!Redragon wrote: Come on guys, let's focus. What do you think about my theory of two exhausts?
Front wing end plates are really plain in comparison to some of the other cars. Did they use this front wing last year also?zoro_f1 wrote:FIA must change the rules. is this an F1 car?
I was thinking the same thing, I think.Redragon wrote:Come on guys, let's focus. What do you think about my theory of two exhausts?Redragon wrote:Redragon wrote:http://jorgelizalde.co.uk/ferrrari/Scre ... 30.532.png
In this picture which i made it brighter with photoshop, you can see and I have marked the direction of the exhaust pointing
I think there are two flows, the exhaust pointing down and center. And hot air from the sidepots pointing break ducts
FW for launching is usually old, so wait until Jerez or maybe even Bcn for new version and other updates.Vasco wrote:Front wing end plates are really plain in comparison to some of the other cars. Did they use this front wing last year also?
photos from different angles. srybeelsebob wrote:
Your ferrari scaling is well off.
