Ferrari F2006

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
Guest
Guest
0

Post

ginsu wrote:
scarbs wrote: Simply saying a keel-less design is best and a single in conservative is over simplifying the issue.
After 2005, I think we can make some conjecture about v-keel, no-keel, vs single keel performance. We cannot say for certain that the performance level of the R25 or Macca were due to their suspension designs, but it's hard to say it wasn't either.

We have to make conjectures about why Ferrari were down last year. Yes, I think primarily it was the Bridgestones, but it doesn't seem like Ferrari attack the issue with innovation. I know that Ross Brawn said last year that they don't really know why they're so slow when they're slow, and they don't know why they're fast when they're fast (This was when Schumi got his one legitimate pole position). This probably breeds some conservative thinking at Ferrari which seems to stifle their innovation.

If we truly examine Ferrari, we might find a mediocre car with an incredible driver with a huge tire advantage (custom compounds from Bridgestone, etc).

I guess I used to think that the Ferrari was the class of the field in all respects, but in recent years I'm not so sure about that car.
Judging from 2005 I am more inclined to think that the advantage enjoyed by Renault and McLaren were not particularly due to their suspension design. Since both run Michelin, which for all intends and purpose are going to be similar, 2 vastly different geometry were used between Renault's V-keel and McLaren's Zerokeel, and both were received with good results. As such, from a tire point of view in which tire should drive how the suspension is designed, we can somewhat conclude that suspension wasn't the primary factor for their competitiveness. Rather more likely, is that their tire is superior in general. Now their individual design difference is going to play a role in how the rest of the area in the car were developed, and the suspension package may have helped them in those area.

Now to say Ferrari failed to tackle their tire issue with innovation is a null point IMO. As really you can't make an informed change on suspension design, if your tire is not up to scratch or consistant enough, we've seen enough time for Ferrari last year that they are sometimes competitive, sometimes way off the pace, and it'll be hard to judge if they were to make any changes, that it was due to their tire on a "off" day or the changes were actually doing anything. And that point also largely play to why really there is very little one can do, if your tire is really not there for most of the year. It is more than likely that you can throw some update on the car, fully expecting it to work out to be certain margin better, and was left wondering why its not working as the tire is not there.

Guest
Guest
0

Post

And that point also largely play to why really there is very little one can do, if your tire is really not there for most of the year. It is more than likely that you can throw some update on the car, fully expecting it to work out to be certain margin better, and was left wondering why its not working as the tire is not there.
I do agree on this point. The relative suprise that Ross Brawn had when Schumie got on pole explained it all to me. "To be honest, I don't know why we're fast today," he said. I know tyre dynamics are quite complex, so unless you have a good handle on why there are tyre problems it would probably not be wise to make big design decisions such as changing suspension designs.

If Ferrari are back in the game this year, then we can all say it was the tyre. It is looking more and more likely that this is so.

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Post

Anonymous wrote:..If Ferrari are back in the game this year, then we can all say it was the tyre. It is looking more and more likely that this is so.
Well, that is why "uncle Max" returned the "notorious" 2004 tyre regulations for 2006 after finding them not suitable for his FavoRRite team

Cost cutting? What was that? :^o

:roll: :roll: :roll:

Guest
Guest
0

Post

Well, that is why "uncle Max" returned the "notorious" 2004 tyre regulations for 2006 after finding them not suitable for his FavoRRite team

Cost cutting? What was that? :^o

Exactly, I love how he hides it all behind the US GP. It's your fault Michelin. You did it to yourself. Bridgestone and Ferrari can hardly keep a straight face.

No matter. The pit was kind of boring last year. So, I will be glad to see them back in full force. Ferrari were always working the stops so well, and I'm sure
the Bridgestones will suddenly work for them again.

Guest
Guest
0

Post

What exactly do you think would have happened if Michelin went to Indy again this year and the same thing happened then? The F.I.A. didn't have a lot of choice.

janus
janus
0
Joined: 28 Jan 2006, 17:49
Location: portugal

f2006 and williams fw28

Post

i was looking at the pics of the willams fw28 and to the ferrari f2006 and the diferences are minimal of you dont count whid the front wing if the cosworth engine is like i suspects to be great ferrari is in trouble..

i think f2006 is a car to forget ..williams puts a car just like the f2006 but that front wing and nose woukd work mutch beatter that ferrari front wing is a ugly solucion

renault, mclaren williams are using a drop nose cone this will increase front downforce ..lets be fair the only teams that got the car right last year were renault and mclaren and the two have a drop nose cone that cant be a coincidence

was for the tires both williams and ferrari are using brigestone if ferrari if this year ferrari dont are fast and williams is they cant blame on the tires

they can blame on the aerodymanics the car sucks i love ferrari but i think ferrari will finish 4 in the championship.

and i pout 500€ on williams for wining the championship

maclarem has a poor engine and renault is the favorite so.... the only real opicion is ferrari or williams..... and i am not putting may money on ferrari [/img]

User avatar
jezzwa
0
Joined: 02 Jan 2006, 14:04
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Post

The F248 will have a new front wing before the start of the season or that is what i am told :D
Vote 1 for GPs back in Adelaide

Guest
Guest
0

Post

I wouldn't put much stock in the present appearance of the cars today. True, we get an idea of the car by external appearance, but in a Formula One car, there's a lot to it that is not observed externally. The balance of the car, the true engine performance, how it interacts with the tires, handles curbs, are just a few examples.
It's a long way until the beginning of the season, and even longer to the conclusion. During that period, a lot of things will change, development will alter the cars, and of course, luck and human errors will all have their say in the final outcome.
Ferrari were not humbled last year, they were embarassed. Trust me, that team is far from gone, and with the tire playing field leveled again, their chances are as good as anyone's.

kilcoo316
kilcoo316
21
Joined: 09 Mar 2005, 16:45
Location: Kilcoo, Ireland

Re: f2006 and williams fw28

Post

janus wrote:i think f2006 is a car to forget ..williams puts a car just like the f2006 but that front wing and nose woukd work mutch beatter that ferrari front wing is a ugly solucion

renault, mclaren williams are using a drop nose cone this will increase front downforce ..lets be fair the only teams that got the car right last year were renault and mclaren and the two have a drop nose cone that cant be a coincidence


and i pout 500€ on williams for wining the championship
I disagree completely over the front wings - the williams looks to be a fairly ugly solution with very little in the way of integration with the front suspension geometry, unlike the ferrari, renault and mclaren (to name 3).

I doubt the subtle differences in the nose droops of the cars would make a significant difference to be honest.

I think you've just lost 500€, sorry. :?

bernard
bernard
0
Joined: 06 Jun 2004, 21:10
Location: France/Finland

Post

jezzwa wrote:The F248 will have a new front wing before the start of the season or that is what i am told :D
I think pretty much all of them are. :D I think Honda and BMW are the only teams with new wings at the moment. The rest of the field are using last year's carry overs.

edit: I meant front wings, naturally.

bernard
bernard
0
Joined: 06 Jun 2004, 21:10
Location: France/Finland

Post

Anonymous wrote:
Judging from 2005 I am more inclined to think that the advantage enjoyed by Renault and McLaren were not particularly due to their suspension design.
Without wanting to sound like a complete fanboy, I would say the main reason Mclaren was where it was in 2005 was Thombazis. They would have been good without him, but he gave them that final sting. Mclaren hadn't been the aerodynamic class of the field since 99. Feel free to disagree.
I would also say the main reason why ferrari lost so much speed was the combination of new aero rules and the departure of their aero guy Thombazis.
Feel free to disagree on that one too.

It's just interesting that ferrari, who had the best aero for ages, suddenly loses that position just as their aero guru leaves the team for Mclaren. And Mclaren suddenly becomes the aero king. Do I see a connection here? :?

Guest
Guest
0

Post

Image

Valencia Feb2.

There are a couple disturbing things about this image. First, it looks like Ferrari have made a cut into the bodywork behind the chimney, similar to what RBR had to do. Is the Ferrari v8 running a bit hot?

Also, the wing profile for the camera mount has a negative angle of attack, thus generating downforce. Now, I used a grid to verify and everything is straight on the car, so it's not an effect from the picture. I know these are not supposed to have any angle of attack because they are supposed to be neutral. Is this one of the ways that Ferrari is bending the rules?

ginsu
ginsu
0
Joined: 17 Jan 2006, 02:23

Post

I just read the 01/26/06 Edition of Autosport on the Ferrari 248 (once called 657?):
"But just a look at the svelte new 657 tells you that maybe there was something in it all. Amid the gorgeous curves and driving swoops enchanced by the reduced radiator area required of the new V8 engines, you'll find...a vee keel front suspension mount...."
We had decided that they did not have two chassis and that they had a single-keel. Are the journos out of their heads or is there something going
on?
I love to love Senna.

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Post

Those journalists should become forum members and learn a thing or two :mrgreen:

ranger
ranger
0
Joined: 02 Mar 2006, 09:23
Location: Malaysia

Post

Rossi is going to be faster in the F2004 car....depends on the enigne...whether it's a V10 or V8 i'm not sure... :roll:
You never know what's going to happen. - Daniel