I believe so.Scuderia1967 wrote:True, last year they were only on the nose, right?Sevach wrote:Hackett gained in exposure though.
I believe so.Scuderia1967 wrote:True, last year they were only on the nose, right?Sevach wrote:Hackett gained in exposure though.
Let me just correct you by saying that Chandon was in the McLaren cars last year, (the deal was signed in September).ME4ME wrote:Yes, you are obviously right, but they do take on a bigger role. Puma and TAG are much more prominent now at Red Bull, and the Chandon partnership was finilized at the end of 2015, but will be first seen this season. Now i think of it, Jack&Jones joined Renault this year, and there is this speculation about Samsung becoming title sponsors of Mclaren. But indeed, lets hope for more sponsors to join! Especially Manor and Haas need a couple of good sponsors, both for finacial reasons and to have something to design their livery around
True. They were a Lotus sponsor, I guess they got tired of waiting for Renault to buy the team (although the company is based in Switzerland, their owner is french)ME4ME wrote:I stand corrected! You're right.
Edit: Fresh news, Richard Mille to sponsor Mclaren
http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/mclar ... er-674321/
I don't think Chandon was ever on the car during the race. The photos you are putting up are press/publicity photos only.
Let me just correct you by saying that Chandon was in the McLaren cars last year, (the deal was signed in September).
http://www.multivu.com/players/English/ ... 647.HR.jpg
That's why I wrote "last year" and not "last year's championship". The bottom of the matter is that Chandon was sponsoring them alreadyMacklaren wrote:I don't think Chandon was ever on the car during the race. The photos you are putting up are press/publicity photos only.
Let me just correct you by saying that Chandon was in the McLaren cars last year, (the deal was signed in September).
http://www.multivu.com/players/English/ ... 647.HR.jpg
I post tweets. So may be your browser can not see them!Gerhardsa wrote:Is it just me or does "LookBackTime" always have blank posts (or Mostly?) ?