Partial pressures are the same independent of other gases. Unless you want to go down detailed canyons.johnny comelately wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 00:42Is there any oxygen in Mexico City with all the air pollution ?
The Pirelli guy gave a nice segment on how they are adapting to the tire blanket ban for 2024, with the reduction for 2023, but other than that, FP2 was too boring to stick around for.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 00:39So going by the comments here FP1 And FP2 were unintriguing.
Isola gave the impression that in addition to reducing understeer thay want more race strategy options probably in the interest of artificial entertainmentAR3-GP wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 01:18The Pirelli guy gave a nice segment on how they are adapting to the tire blanket ban for 2024, with the reduction for 2023, but other than that, FP2 was too boring to stick around for.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 00:39So going by the comments here FP1 And FP2 were unintriguing.
FP1 wasn't bad but no one was really pushing with such low grip.
As a general theme, the tires are too hard this weekend.
Having more performance gap between the compounds is the way it should be.johnny comelately wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 02:59Isola gave the impression that in addition to reducing understeer thay want more race strategy options probably in the interest of artificial entertainmentAR3-GP wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 01:18The Pirelli guy gave a nice segment on how they are adapting to the tire blanket ban for 2024, with the reduction for 2023, but other than that, FP2 was too boring to stick around for.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 00:39So going by the comments here FP1 And FP2 were unintriguing.
FP1 wasn't bad but no one was really pushing with such low grip.
As a general theme, the tires are too hard this weekend.
Does viable mean race winning?organic wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 11:07I think it's more about consistent performance gaps between compounds. This year at most weekends there have been only 2 of the 3 compounds in the race that are good. Having a more consistent performance gap between compounds means that at a given weekend all 3 compounds could be viable in the race and open door to strategies similar to Zandvoort (where all 3 tyres worked well).
Well think back to Zandvoort where RB tried 2-stop with softs and medium whereas Merc tried 1-stop medium hard and it seemed like Merc would've had at least a chance of the winjohnny comelately wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 11:08Does viable mean race winning?organic wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 11:07I think it's more about consistent performance gaps between compounds. This year at most weekends there have been only 2 of the 3 compounds in the race that are good. Having a more consistent performance gap between compounds means that at a given weekend all 3 compounds could be viable in the race and open door to strategies similar to Zandvoort (where all 3 tyres worked well).
It was meant as an attempt at sarcastic humour about the degree of pollution in Mexico City being one of the most polluted cities in the world. It is ironic to be having a motor race there (another canyon)MadMax wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 01:14Partial pressures are the same independent of other gases. Unless you want to go down detailed canyons.johnny comelately wrote: ↑29 Oct 2022, 00:42Is there any oxygen in Mexico City with all the air pollution ?