Indeed. Fred now knows he has a competitive car with assets like great mechanical grip and it’s gentle on the tires. The 05-06 Alonso has been awakened.
Alonso could be threat to Carlos. Luckily for Carlos there shouldn't be deg problem. Otherwise it could be easy for ALOSofa King wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023, 19:07With Charles starting back, it will be great to see the battle between Carlos with a less draggy Ferrari, Fernando and Lance for third. We should also remember that the last two races here had 5-6 cars not finish. We could see an Alpine in the top 6 after Gasly’s blistering final stint pace on the C3s, which are now the medium tire and a Williams in the top 10 on a lower downforce track. Inshallah, Checo will keep it interesting with Max in the front!
I guess they simply decided to already take the penalty in Jeddah because it’s a track with good overtaking opportunity.AR3-GP wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023, 18:14Why wouldn't they use it here?LM10 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023, 18:08I think that the first one was changed as a precaution because it showed some anomaly and caused a discharge of the battery the night before the race. It then was sent to the factory for further checks. Might mean that it was/is salvageable and thus still in the pool.
I think it's likely they aren't sure if the "recovered" one is actually good, and they don't want a second DNF in a row.LM10 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023, 20:52I guess they simply decided to already take the penalty in Jeddah because it’s a track with good overtaking opportunity.AR3-GP wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023, 18:14Why wouldn't they use it here?LM10 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023, 18:08
I think that the first one was changed as a precaution because it showed some anomaly and caused a discharge of the battery the night before the race. It then was sent to the factory for further checks. Might mean that it was/is salvageable and thus still in the pool.
So far just ECU, but if they decide to take a new ES or another ECU before the start of the race it's back of the grid.