+1....Scuderia Ferrari have gone nuts to hire cry baby Alonso when they ve already got someone with prodigious racing skills....the iceman.mx_tifosi wrote:.. it's just that I thought Raikkonen was awesome, pure and simple.
Remember a quote from Michael schumchaer that Ferrari took the development of their car in the likes of Massa, and thats the reason why Kimi was strugglingandartop wrote:Kimi was awesome...when he got the WDC in 2007, and then again after Massa's accident!
Obviously a decision like this and a deal like this take some time to be made.
In 2008 Kimi was often underperforming right until the last 5-6 laps or so, when he would suddenly wake up and do the fastest lap or start chasing the guy in front when it was a bit too late. True, he had some unreliability issues, but quite a few crashes as well.
In the second half of 2008, Kimi got the following results: 6th, 3rd, DNF, DNF, 9th, DNF, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, while Massa respectively achieved: 3rd, DNF, 1st, 1st, 6th, DNF, 7th, 2nd and 1st. More importantly (which these figures can never demonstrate), Felipe was more often than not driving his socks off while Kimi did not seem to be really focused on the job at hand.
My guess is that the decision was made around that time, and in view of the two drivers' performance it would appear to be quite an easy decision which of the two would be ditched.
Whether it will prove to be a wise move or not remains to be seen, but I believe it doesn't seem to be such a bad decision all things considered.
In F1, compromise = slow. For example, Brawn's evolution suited Button at the start of the season, then Rubens later in the season. It's not ever been in a state that has suited both drivers at the same time.siskue2005 wrote:Its Ferrari's fault to not develop in Kimi's direction
Or at least give a fair compromise for both of them
you are rightrichard_leeds wrote:In F1, compromise = slow. For example, Brawn's evolution suited Button at the start of the season, then Rubens later in the season. It's not ever been in a state that has suited both drivers at the same time.siskue2005 wrote:Its Ferrari's fault to not develop in Kimi's direction
Or at least give a fair compromise for both of them
very true, because Ferrari was searching for more rear grip since TC was taken away and massa crashed out the 1st 2 races. Notice how kimi had to use a smaller rear wing in spain to make the car towards his style. I think its ok if Ferrari wants to assist the weaker driver, but they can not just throw kimi under the bus and expect him to win. The key in Ferrari is aldo di costa, he went all out on aero performance and long lasting tyres that the drivers are not in full control of the performace of the car since aero is not controlled by the driver but mechanical grip is.siskue2005 wrote:you are rightrichard_leeds wrote:In F1, compromise = slow. For example, Brawn's evolution suited Button at the start of the season, then Rubens later in the season. It's not ever been in a state that has suited both drivers at the same time.siskue2005 wrote:Its Ferrari's fault to not develop in Kimi's direction
Or at least give a fair compromise for both of them
but Kimi was leading the WDC by 13 points at that point in 2008
I think Ferrari should have concentrated on him and should have increased that lead much more and in the process could have bagged both the WDC last year
Its ferrari's fault they concentrated on Massa
No worries, if Kimi goes to McL then we're going to see at least two leading teams with "no 1" drivers capable of the WDC in both seats. That means more head to head competition, and that will be awesome!LotusF1 wrote:I wonder whether Kimi started to race again once he knew his contract was under review...in 2008 he was good, but in 09 not so good. I would have loved to see KR and FA together...would have been awesome...
Are you serious? Apart from the schumi years, a WDC is an elusive thing, with a huge amount of luck involved. Coming within 1 point of the WDC is not a --- up!tarzoon wrote:Massa still managed to f*ck up and finish second.
Besides, Kimi's character is not colourful enough for the prancing horse firm.