Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

raymondu999 wrote:Why would the EBD be a disadvantage in the wet? I can see the EBD having LESS of an advantage in the wet, but why would it be a disadvantage?
Can't get on the throttle when you want, don't get the downforce, upsets the balance of the car.

kalinka
kalinka
9
Joined: 19 Feb 2010, 00:01
Location: Hungary

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

I think McLaren has lost rain-performance since introducing EBD last year, but they were generally very good in rain these years, especially with Hamilton. I'm really courius where they stand with MP4-26 in rain. I like rain races but when it's Sepang, it's almost always too much of it...

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

myurr wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:Why would the EBD be a disadvantage in the wet? I can see the EBD having LESS of an advantage in the wet, but why would it be a disadvantage?
Can't get on the throttle when you want, don't get the downforce, upsets the balance of the car.
Can't get the throttle on would mean less downforce, yes, but it would still have more downforce than a non-EBD car
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

nacho
nacho
6
Joined: 04 Sep 2009, 08:38

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

Valsecchi is driving in FP1 for Team Lotus. How much does a practise session like this cost for a driver? How much does it hamper the teams efforts to solve the tire warming problems, even if he doesn't bin it straight out of the pits like Chandok?

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

raymondu999 wrote:
myurr wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:Why would the EBD be a disadvantage in the wet? I can see the EBD having LESS of an advantage in the wet, but why would it be a disadvantage?
Can't get on the throttle when you want, don't get the downforce, upsets the balance of the car.
Can't get the throttle on would mean less downforce, yes, but it would still have more downforce than a non-EBD car
But the car would not be balanced, with corner to corner lap to lap balance shifts due to varying use of the throttle, whereas the front wing is set in stone.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

Of course not! It would flex less, so even with less EBD downforce, there would be less front wing downforce :mrgreen: I jest, of course :mrgreen:
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

volarchico
volarchico
0
Joined: 26 Feb 2010, 07:27

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

A wet race can definitely be exciting if it doesn't get rained out or red-flagged for too long. But unfortunately with a wet race, we'll have another week of bantering about if "McLaren is really off pace" and that this race is not a good indicator of W02's pace.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

This may sound weird, but I actually am not looking for the overtaking (while that is an excellent add-on) but I love watching the spray coming out the back. Call me weird. Whatever. lol
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

oranjemanzandvoort
oranjemanzandvoort
0
Joined: 30 Oct 2010, 00:55

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

can anyone tell me whitch weatherradar images the teams use in malaysia ??

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

They all use Meteo France
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

oranjemanzandvoort wrote:can anyone tell me whitch weatherradar images the teams use in malaysia ??
I was under the impression that weather radars were *near* useless at Sepang because the track is right next to the source of the clouds... The result is that the clouds don't form until they're already dumping the water on the track.

alelanza
alelanza
7
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 05:05
Location: San José, Costa Rica

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

myurr wrote: But the car would not be balanced, with corner to corner lap to lap balance shifts due to varying use of the throttle, whereas the front wing is set in stone.
Hmmm... initially i disagreed with you but i guess i understand, you're saying that in the rain with far more unpredictable grip drivers have to feel their way around more often, thus upsetting the aero more while doing that?
Then again i wonder how significant that effect is, and how many data points you're using to determine EBD equals poor perfomance in the rain.
Alejandro L.

donskar
donskar
2
Joined: 03 Feb 2007, 16:41
Location: Cardboard box, end of Boulevard of Broken Dreams

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

raymondu999 wrote:This may sound weird, but I actually am not looking for the overtaking (while that is an excellent add-on) but I love watching the spray coming out the back. Call me weird. Whatever. lol
OK, you're weird. :lol:
Seriously, a wet race is good, IMHO. A rained-out/red flag race is bad. Given the state of RB's KERS, a heavy rain could help RB a lot (I'm assuming KERS would less useful on a very wet track?)
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill

CHT
CHT
-6
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 05:24

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

donskar wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:This may sound weird, but I actually am not looking for the overtaking (while that is an excellent add-on) but I love watching the spray coming out the back. Call me weird. Whatever. lol
OK, you're weird. :lol:
Seriously, a wet race is good, IMHO. A rained-out/red flag race is bad. Given the state of RB's KERS, a heavy rain could help RB a lot (I'm assuming KERS would less useful on a very wet track?)
Dont be fooled by what Horner say about RBR KERS. RB7 just quick that they can choose not to use it for Australia.

Will be watching the race from turn 6,7,8 and I am hoping it will be a dry race

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Malaysian GP 2011 - Sepang

Post

Well that's the most reliable source right now, as he's the only person in any real position to know about the KERS. But I think, crucially, a wet start would greatly diminish the advantage of KERS. Newey might factor that in and think that no-KERS, for better airflow and packaging would be more beneficial in case of a wet start & race. We saw how the bazooka exhaust morphed into a small hole after they removed KERS
失败者找理由,成功者找方法